ArticleJournal of biological engineering2020
Novel 3D embryo implantation model within macroporous alginate scaffolds.
Article in Journal of biological engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioengineering trends in female reproduction: a systematic review.Human reproduction update · 2022Pooled it
- Engineering the human endometrium at the intersection of development and reproduction.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Free apical surface hetero-cellular CDH1 homophilic binding is a major mediator of blastocyst-endometrium interaction in humans.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Endometrial Microbiome and Reproductive Receptivity: Diverse Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Extracellular Vesicles, Lipid Droplets and AhR Ligands in Early Implantation: The Dynamics of Embryo-Maternal Crosstalk.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2025Article
- Bioprinted Hormone-Responsive Bilayer Model of Human Endometrium for Embryo Implantation Studies.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- Review
- Exploring the black box of human reproduction: endometrial organoids and assembloids - generation, implantation modeling, and future clinical perspectives.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- 3D model of the maternal-fetal interface: challenges, recent advances and beyond.Histology and histopathology · 2023Review
- Modeling development using hydrogels.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023Article
- Opportunities involving microfluidics and 3D culture systems to theAnimal reproduction · 2023Review
- Novel microarchitecture of human endometrial glands: implications in endometrial regeneration and pathologies.Human reproduction update · 2022Review
- TNF-α Regulated Endometrial Stroma Secretome Promotes Trophoblast Invasion.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Exosomal miR-203a-3p Enhances Endometrial Receptivity by Upregulating E-Cadherin Expression Through the Direct Targeting of SNAI1 in Endometrial Epithelial Cells.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImplantation failure remains an unsolved obstacle in reproductive medicine. Previous studies have indicated that estrogen responsiveness, specifically by estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), is crucial for proper implantation. There is an utmost need for a reliable in vitro model that mimics the events in the uterine wall during the implantation process for studying the regulatory mechanisms governing the process. The current two-dimensional and hydrogel-based in vitro models provide only short-term endometrial cell culture with partial functionality.
resultsEndometrial biopsies showed an increase in E-cadherin expression on the typical window of implantation of fertile women, compared to negligible expression in recurrent implantation failure (RIF) patients. These clinical results indicated E-cadherin as a marker for receptivity. Three-dimensional (3D) macroporous alginate scaffolds were the base for epithelial endometrial cell-seeding and long-term culture under hormone treatment that mimicked a typical menstrual cycle. The RL95-2 epithelial cell culture in macroporous scaffolds was viable for 3 weeks and showed increased E-cadherin levels in response to estrogen. Human choriocarcinoma (JAR) spheroids were used as embryo models, seeded onto cell constructs and successfully adhered to the RL95-2 cell culture. Moreover, a second model of HEC-1A with low ERα levels, showed lower E-cadherin expression and no JAR attachment. E-cadherin expression and JAR attachment were recovered in HEC-1A cells that were transfected with ERα plasmid.
conclusionsWe present a novel model that enables culturing endometrial cells on a 3D matrix for 3 weeks under hormonal treatment. It confirmed the importance of ERα function and E-cadherin for proper implantation. This platform may serve to elucidate the regulatory mechanisms controlling the implantation process, and for screening and evaluating potential novel therapeutic strategies for RIF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.