Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32617117›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2020

Detection of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules Based on Brain-Computer Interface.

Shi Qiu, Junjun Li, Mengdi Cong, Chun Wu, Yan Qin, Ting Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Algorithm of Pulmonary Vascular Segment and Centerline Extraction.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shi QiuKey Laboratory of Spectral Imaging Technology CAS, Xi'an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an 710119, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6969-6240
Junjun LiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.
Mengdi CongDepartment of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance, Children's Hospital of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050031, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1371-2301
Chun WuBeiJing Hi-Tech Institute, Beijing 00085, China.
Yan QinBeiJing Hi-Tech Institute, Beijing 00085, China.
Ting LiangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7924-5195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solitary pulmonary nodules are the main manifestation of pulmonary lesions. Doctors often make diagnosis by observing the lung CT images. In order to further study the brain response structure and construct a brain-computer interface, we propose an isolated pulmonary nodule detection model based on a brain-computer interface. First, a single channel time-frequency feature extraction model is constructed based on the analysis of EEG data. Second, a multilayer fusion model is proposed to establish the brain-computer interface by connecting the brain electrical signal with a computer. Finally, according to image presentation, a three-frame image presentation method with different window widths and window positions is proposed to effectively detect the solitary pulmonary nodules.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsBrain-Computer InterfacesComputational BiologyDeep LearningElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSolitary Pulmonary NoduleTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID32617117
PMCPMC7312740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.