Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32616877›Full record

ReviewHeredity2020

Multi-parent populations in crops: a toolbox integrating genomics and genetic mapping with breeding.

Michael F Scott, Olufunmilayo Ladejobi, Samer Amer, Alison R Bentley, Jay Biernaskie, Scott A Boden, Matt Clark, Matteo Dell'Acqua, Laura E Dixon, Carla V Filippi and 13 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heredity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 126 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Meta genetic analysis of melon sweetness.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Genetic dissection of grain yield and correlated proxy traits under suboptimal conditions.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Michael F Scott *UCL Genetics Institute, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. m.f.scott@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7182-9946
Olufunmilayo Ladejobi *UCL Genetics Institute, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. f.ladejobi@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0508-0578
Samer AmerUniversity of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7584-5636
Alison R BentleyThe John Bingham Laboratory, NIAB, 93 Lawrence Weaver Road, Cambridge, CB3 0LE, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5519-4357
Jay BiernaskieDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3RB, UK.
Scott A BodenSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia.
Matt ClarkNatural History Museum, London, UK.
Matteo Dell'AcquaInstitute of Life Sciences, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Laura E DixonFaculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Carla V FilippiInstituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABIMO), INTA-CONICET, Nicolas Repetto y Los Reseros s/n, 1686, Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5564-7480
Nick FradgleyThe John Bingham Laboratory, NIAB, 93 Lawrence Weaver Road, Cambridge, CB3 0LE, UK.
Keith A GardnerThe John Bingham Laboratory, NIAB, 93 Lawrence Weaver Road, Cambridge, CB3 0LE, UK.
Ian J MackaySRUC, West Mains Road, Kings Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1109-4730
Donal O'SullivanUniversity of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4889-056X
Lawrence Percival-AlwynThe John Bingham Laboratory, NIAB, 93 Lawrence Weaver Road, Cambridge, CB3 0LE, UK.
Manish RoorkiwalCenter of Excellence in Genomics and Systems Biology, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6595-281X
Rakesh Kumar SinghInternational Center for Biosaline Agriculture, Academic City, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7463-3044
Mahendar ThudiCenter of Excellence in Genomics and Systems Biology, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Rajeev Kumar VarshneyCenter of Excellence in Genomics and Systems Biology, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4562-9131
Luca VenturiniNatural History Museum, London, UK.
Alex WhanCSIRO, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
James Cockram *The John Bingham Laboratory, NIAB, 93 Lawrence Weaver Road, Cambridge, CB3 0LE, UK.
Richard Mott *UCL Genetics Institute, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1022-9330

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S031677/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop populations derived from experimental crosses enable the genetic dissection of complex traits and support modern plant breeding. Among these, multi-parent populations now play a central role. By mixing and recombining the genomes of multiple founders, multi-parent populations combine many commonly sought beneficial properties of genetic mapping populations. For example, they have high power and resolution for mapping quantitative trait loci, high genetic diversity and minimal population structure. Many multi-parent populations have been constructed in crop species, and their inbred germplasm and associated phenotypic and genotypic data serve as enduring resources. Their utility has grown from being a tool for mapping quantitative trait loci to a means of providing germplasm for breeding programmes. Genomics approaches, including de novo genome assemblies and gene annotations for the population founders, have allowed the imputation of rich sequence information into the descendent population, expanding the breadth of research and breeding applications of multi-parent populations. Here, we report recent successes from crop multi-parent populations in crops. We also propose an ideal genotypic, phenotypic and germplasm 'package' that multi-parent populations should feature to optimise their use as powerful community resources for crop research, development and breeding.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalGenomicsPlant BreedingChromosome MappingGenome, PlantQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID32616877
PMCPMC7784848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.