Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32616859›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Epigenetic profiling demarcates molecular subtypes of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

K E van der Vos, D J Vis, E Nevedomskaya, Y Kim, W Choi, D McConkey, L F A Wessels, B W G van Rhijn, W Zwart, M S van der Heijden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Epigenetic and Immunological Features of Bladder Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

K E van der Vos *Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
D J Vis *Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
E NevedomskayaDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Y KimDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
W ChoiJohns Hopkins Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute, Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
D McConkeyJohns Hopkins Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute, Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
L F A WesselsDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
B W G van RhijnDepartment of Surgical Oncology (Urology), The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
W ZwartDivision of Oncogenomics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M S van der HeijdenDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ms.vd.heijden@nki.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4407-7881
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is a heterogeneous disease that often recurs despite aggressive treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and (radical) cystectomy. Basal and luminal molecular subtypes have been identified that are linked to clinical characteristics and have differential sensitivities to chemotherapy. While it has been suggested that epigenetic mechanisms play a role in defining these subtypes, a thorough understanding of the biological mechanisms is lacking. This report details the first genome-wide analysis of histone methylation patterns of human primary bladder tumours by chromatin immunoprecipitations and next-generation sequencing (ChIP-seq). We profiled multiple histone marks: H3K27me3, a marker for repressed genes, and H3K4me1 and H3K4me3, which are indicators of active enhancers and active promoters. Integrated analysis of ChIP-seq data and RNA sequencing revealed that H3K4 mono-methylation demarcates MIBC subtypes, while no association was found for the other two histone modifications in relation to basal and luminal subtypes. Additionally, we identified differentially methylated H3K4me1 peaks in basal and luminal tumour samples, suggesting that active enhancers play a role in defining subtypes. Our study is the first analysis of histone modifications in primary bladder cancer tissue and provides an important resource for the bladder cancer community.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCystectomyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression ProfilingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle NeoplasmsNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID32616859
PMCPMC7331601
OpenAlexW3039035438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.