Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32616798›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Inter-laboratory reproducibility of an untargeted metabolomics GC-MS assay for analysis of human plasma.

Yanping Lin, Gary W Caldwell, Ying Li, Wensheng Lang, John Masucci

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Plant Metabolomics: The Future of Anticancer Drug Discovery.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yanping LinJanssen Research and Development, Johnson and Johnson, 1400 McKean Road, Spring House, 19477, PA, USA. ylin82@its.jnj.com.
Gary W CaldwellJanssen Research and Development, Johnson and Johnson, 1400 McKean Road, Spring House, 19477, PA, USA.
Ying LiJanssen Research and Development, Johnson and Johnson, 1400 McKean Road, Spring House, 19477, PA, USA.
Wensheng LangJanssen Research and Development, Johnson and Johnson, 1400 McKean Road, Spring House, 19477, PA, USA.
John MasucciJanssen Research and Development, Johnson and Johnson, 1400 McKean Road, Spring House, 19477, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a long-standing concern for the lack of reproducibility of the untargeted metabolomic approaches used in pharmaceutical research. Two types of human plasma samples were split into two batches and analyzed in two individual labs for untargeted GC-MS metabolomic profiling. The two labs used the same silylation sample preparation protocols but different instrumentation, data processing software, and database. There were 55 metabolites annotated reproducibly, independent of the labs. The median coefficient variations (CV%) of absolute spectra ion intensities in both labs were less than 30%. However, the comparison of normalized ion intensity among biological groups, were inconsistent across labs. Predicted power based on annotated metabolites was evaluated post various normalization, data transformation and scaling. For the first time our study reveals the numerical details about the variations in metabolomic annotation and relative quantification using plain inter-laboratory GC-MS untargeted metabolomic approaches. Especially we compare several commonly used post-acquisition strategies and found normalization could not strengthen the annotation accuracy or relative quantification precision of untargeted approach, instead it will impact future experimental design. Standardization of untargeted metabolomics protocols, including sample preparation, instrumentation, data processing, etc., is critical for comparison of untargeted data across labs.

Indexed as

Blood Chemical AnalysisFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansLaboratory Proficiency TestingMaleMetabolomicsPlasmaReproducibility of ResultsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID32616798
PMCPMC7331679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.