Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32616766›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Functional organization of mouse primary auditory cortex in adult C57BL/6 and F1 (CBAxC57) mice.

Zac Bowen, Daniel E Winkowski, Patrick O Kanold

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Aging in the Primary Auditory Cortex.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Rapid rebalancing of co-tuned ensemble activity in the auditory cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Patchy harmonic functional connectivity of the mouse auditory cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zac BowenDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, 1116 Biosciences Res. Bldg., College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Daniel E WinkowskiDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, 1116 Biosciences Res. Bldg., College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Patrick O KanoldDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, 1116 Biosciences Res. Bldg., College Park, MD, 20742, USA. pkanold@umd.edu.
University of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Readout and control of spatiotemporal neuronal codes for behaviorU19NS107464 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MAUNSELL, JOHN H.R. · 2018 to 2022
$17.3M
NEURONAL CIRCUITS AND PLASTICITY OF NEONATAL AUDITORY CORTEXR01DC009607 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI PATRICK O KANOLD · 2009 to 2026
$7.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009607NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS107464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary auditory cortex (A1) plays a key role for sound perception since it represents one of the first cortical processing stations for sounds. Recent studies have shown that on the cellular level the frequency organization of A1 is more heterogeneous than previously appreciated. However, many of these studies were performed in mice on the C57BL/6 background which develop high frequency hearing loss with age making them a less optimal choice for auditory research. In contrast, mice on the CBA background retain better hearing sensitivity in old age. Since potential strain differences could exist in A1 organization between strains, we performed comparative analysis of neuronal populations in A1 of adult (~ 10 weeks) C57BL/6 mice and F1 (CBAxC57) mice. We used in vivo 2-photon imaging of pyramidal neurons in cortical layers L4 and L2/3 of awake mouse primary auditory cortex (A1) to characterize the populations of neurons that were active to tonal stimuli. Pure tones recruited neurons of widely ranging frequency preference in both layers and strains with neurons in F1 (CBAxC57) mice exhibiting a wider range of frequency preference particularly to higher frequencies. Frequency selectivity was slightly higher in C57BL/6 mice while neurons in F1 (CBAxC57) mice showed a greater sound-level sensitivity. The spatial heterogeneity of frequency preference was present in both strains with F1 (CBAxC57) mice exhibiting higher tuning diversity across all measured length scales. Our results demonstrate that the tone evoked responses and frequency representation in A1 of adult C57BL/6 and F1 (CBAxC57) mice are largely similar.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory CortexCadherinsCrosses, GeneticEvoked Potentials, AuditoryMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred CBAMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, ConfocalNeuroimagingPresbycusisPyramidal CellsCadherinsCdh23 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID32616766
PMCPMC7331716
OpenAlexW3038960790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.