Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32616760›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

HAPPENN is a novel tool for hemolytic activity prediction for therapeutic peptides which employs neural networks.

Patrick Brendan Timmons, Chandralal M Hewage

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Peptide-Based Strategies AgainstPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  14. A large language model for predicting neurotoxic peptides and neurotoxins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patrick Brendan TimmonsUCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Centre for Synthesis and Chemical Biology, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Chandralal M HewageUCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Centre for Synthesis and Chemical Biology, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland. chandralal.hewage@ucd.ie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing prevalence of resistance to antibiotics motivates the search for new antibacterial agents. Antimicrobial peptides are a diverse class of well-studied membrane-active peptides which function as part of the innate host defence system, and form a promising avenue in antibiotic drug research. Some antimicrobial peptides exhibit toxicity against eukaryotic membranes, typically characterised by hemolytic activity assays, but currently, the understanding of what differentiates hemolytic and non-hemolytic peptides is limited. This study leverages advances in machine learning research to produce a novel artificial neural network classifier for the prediction of hemolytic activity from a peptide's primary sequence. The classifier achieves best-in-class performance, with cross-validated accuracy of [Formula: see text] and Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.71. This innovative classifier is available as a web server at https://research.timmons.eu/happenn , allowing the research community to utilise it for in silico screening of peptide drug candidates for high therapeutic efficacies.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerSoftwareAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesComputer SimulationHemolysisHemolytic AgentsHumansSequence Analysis, ProteinAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesHemolytic Agents

Identifiers

PMID32616760
PMCPMC7331684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.