Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32616726›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Quantification of muco-obstructive lung disease variability in mice via laboratory X-ray velocimetry.

Freda Werdiger, Martin Donnelley, Stephen Dubsky, Rhiannon P Murrie, Richard P Carnibella, Chaminda R Samarage, Ying Y How, Graeme R Zosky, Andreas Fouras, David W Parsons and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Freda WerdigerDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. fwerdiger@gmail.com.
Martin DonnelleyRobinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5320-7756
Stephen DubskyDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Rhiannon P MurrieDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Richard P Carnibella4Dx Limited, Melbourne, Australia.
Chaminda R Samarage4Dx Limited, Melbourne, Australia.
Ying Y HowSchool of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Graeme R ZoskySchool of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Andreas FourasDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
David W ParsonsRobinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Kaye S MorganSchool of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Monash University · AUWomen's and Children's Hospital · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To effectively diagnose, monitor and treat respiratory disease clinicians should be able to accurately assess the spatial distribution of airflow across the fine structure of lung. This capability would enable any decline or improvement in health to be located and measured, allowing improved treatment options to be designed. Current lung function assessment methods have many limitations, including the inability to accurately localise the origin of global changes within the lung. However, X-ray velocimetry (XV) has recently been demonstrated to be a sophisticated and non-invasive lung function measurement tool that is able to display the full dynamics of airflow throughout the lung over the natural breathing cycle. In this study we present two developments in XV analysis. Firstly, we show the ability of laboratory-based XV to detect the patchy nature of cystic fibrosis (CF)-like disease in β-ENaC mice. Secondly, we present a technique for numerical quantification of CF-like disease in mice that can delineate between two major modes of disease symptoms. We propose this analytical model as a simple, easy-to-interpret approach, and one capable of being readily applied to large quantities of data generated in XV imaging. Together these advances show the power of XV for assessing local airflow changes. We propose that XV should be considered as a novel lung function measurement tool for lung therapeutics development in small animal models, for CF and for other muco-obstructive diseases.

Indexed as

Mucociliary ClearanceAnimalsHeartLung Diseases, ObstructiveMiceMucusX-Ray Microtomography

Identifiers

PMID32616726
PMCPMC7331693
OpenAlexW3038469303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.