Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32616683›Full record

ArticleGut and liver2021

Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Infliximab versus Adalimumab Treatment in Biologic-Naïve Patients with Ulcerative Colitis.

Yong Il Lee, Yehyun Park, Soo Jung Park, Tae Il Kim, Won Ho Kim, Jae Hee Cheon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut and liver, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06269185 (Comparison of Short and Long-term Efficacy Between Infliximab and Adalimumab on Patients With Ulcerative Colitis - a Retrospective Observational Multicenter Cohort Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06269185 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Short and Long-term Efficacy Between Infliximab and Adalimumab on Patients With Ulcerative Colitis - a Retrospective Observational Multicenter Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorVastra Gotaland RegionRan2024 to 2024Enrolled271ConditionsUlcerative Colitis, Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesArmsInfliximab, Adalimumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Therapeutic Antibodies in Medicine.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yong Il LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2635-7986
Yehyun ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8811-0631
Soo Jung ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0699-6809
Tae Il KimDepartment of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4807-890X
Won Ho KimDepartment of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5682-9972
Jae Hee CheonDepartment of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2282-8904
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsThe tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors infliximab and adalimumab are standard treatments for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). However, there has been no headto- head comparison of treatment efficacy and outcomes between the two agents. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and long-term outcomes of infliximab versus adalimumab treatment in biologic-naïve patients with UC.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the records of 113 biologic-naïve patients with UC who were treated between September 2012 and December 2017 (the infliximab group [n=83] and the adalimumab group [n=30]). We compared remission and response rates between these groups at 8 and 52 weeks. We used Kaplan-Meier curves to compare long-term outcomes, and logistic regression analysis and Cox-proportional hazard regression models to assess factors affecting outcomes.

resultsThe median follow-up duration was 25.8 months. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the rate of clinical remission or clinical response at 8 or 52 weeks. Multivariate analyses also showed that long-term outcomes were not significantly different (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 2.56; p=0.208). An elevated C-reactive protein level (greater than 5 mg/L) was a significant predictive factor for poor outcomes (adjusted HR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.37 to 3.70; p=0.001). During the follow-up period, the rates of adverse event were not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.441).

conclusionsIn our study, infliximab and adalimumab had similar treatment efficacy and longterm outcomes in biologic-naïve patients with moderate to severe UC.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeAdalimumabBiological ProductsHumansInfliximabRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAdalimumabBiological ProductsInfliximabTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAdalimumabColitisComparative studyInfliximabTumor necrosis factor-alphaulcerative

Identifiers

PMID32616683
PMCPMC7960969
OpenAlexW3039777417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.