Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32616617›Full record

ArticleDiabetes care2020

Retention Among Participants in the National Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Change Program, 2012-2017.

Michael J Cannon, Svetlana Masalovich, Boon Peng Ng, Robin E Soler, Rajai Jabrah, Elizabeth K Ely, Bryce D Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Lower-Intensity Interventions for Prediabetes: A Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Using Peer Support to Prevent Diabetes: Results of a Pragmatic RCT.American journal of preventive medicine · 2023
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael J CannonTranslation, Health Education, and Evaluation Branch, Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA mcannon@cdc.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-5776-5010
Svetlana MasalovichCyberData Technologies, Inc., Herndon, VA.
Boon Peng NgCollege of Nursing and Disability, Aging and Technology Cluster, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.
Robin E SolerTranslation, Health Education, and Evaluation Branch, Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0001-5420-3776
Rajai JabrahDB Consulting Group, Bethesda, MD.
Elizabeth K ElyTranslation, Health Education, and Evaluation Branch, Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0001-7990-5766
Bryce D SmithTranslation, Health Education, and Evaluation Branch, Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess retention in the National Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) lifestyle change program, which seeks to prevent type 2 diabetes in adults at high risk. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe analyzed retention among 41,203 individuals who enrolled in Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-recognized in-person lifestyle change programs at organizations that submitted data to CDC's Diabetes Prevention Recognition Program during January 2012-February 2017.

resultsWeekly attrition rates were typically <1-2% but were between 3.5% and 5% at week 2 and at weeks 17 and 18, where session frequency typically transitions from weekly to monthly. The percentage of participants retained through 18 weeks varied by age (45.9% for 18-29 year olds, 53.4% for 30-44 year olds, 60.2% for 45-54 year olds, 66.7% for 55-64 year olds, and 67.6% for ≥65 year olds), race/ethnicity (70.5% for non-Hispanic whites, 60.5% for non-Hispanic blacks, 52.6% for Hispanics, and 50.6% for other), mean weekly percentage of body weight lost (41.0% for ≤0% lost, 66.2% for >0% to <0.25% lost, 72.9% for 0.25% to <0.5% lost, and 73.9% for ≥0.5% lost), and mean weekly physical activity minutes (12.8% for 0 min, 56.1% for >0 to <60 min, 74.8% for 60 to <150 min, and 82.8% for ≥150 min) but not by sex (63.0% for men and 63.1% for women).

conclusionsOur results demonstrate the need to identify strategies to improve retention, especially among individuals who are younger or are members of racial/ethnic minority populations and among those who report less physical activity or less early weight loss. Strategies that address retention after the first session and during the transition from weekly to monthly sessions offer the greatest opportunity for impact.

Indexed as

Life StylePrimary PreventionRisk Reduction BehaviorAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2EthnicityExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinority Groups

Identifiers

PMID32616617
PMCPMC11000538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.