Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32616405›Full record

SynthesisEuropean urology2020

Telehealth in Urology: A Systematic Review of the Literature. How Much Can Telemedicine Be Useful During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Giacomo Novara, Enrico Checcucci, Alessandro Crestani, Alberto Abrate, Francesco Esperto, Nicola Pavan, Cosimo De Nunzio, Antonio Galfano, Gianluca Giannarini, Andrea Gregori and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05154760 (The Effectiveness of the Video Conferencing Telerehabilitation Method, Delivered in One on One and Group Sessions, in Urinary Incontinence Cases), which is not on this map. Cited by 111 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
29.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05154760 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effectiveness of the Video Conferencing Telerehabilitation Method, Delivered in One on One and Group Sessions, in Urinary Incontinence Cases

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarmara UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled32ConditionsUrinary Incontinence,Stress, Telerehabilitation, Pelvic Floor Muscle Training, VideoconferencingArmsPelvic floor muscle training, diaphragmatic breathing exercise, core exercises
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 205 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Giacomo NovaraDepartment Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Italy. Electronic address: giacomonovara@gmail.com.
Enrico CheccucciDivision of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy.
Alessandro CrestaniUrology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Alberto AbrateUrology Section, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Francesco EspertoDepartment of Urology, Campus Biomedico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Nicola PavanDepartment of Urology, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy.
Cosimo De NunzioDepartment of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Antonio GalfanoUrology Unit, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Gianluca GiannariniUrology Unit, Academic Medical Centre, "Santa Maria della Misericordia" Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Andrea GregoriUrology Unit, Ospedale Sacco, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni LiguoriDepartment of Urology, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy.
Riccardo BartolettiDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies, Urologic Unit, University of Pisa, Italy.
Francesco PorpigliaDivision of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy.
Roberto Mario ScarpaDepartment of Urology, Campus Biomedico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Alchiede SimonatoUrology Section, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy; Urology Unit, Department of Surgery, S. Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
Carlo TrombettaDepartment of Urology, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy.
Andrea TubaroDepartment of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo FicarraDepartment of Human and Pediatric Pathology "Gaetano Barresi", Urologic Section, University of Messina, Italy.
Research Urology Network (RUN)
University of Trieste · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · ITUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · ITUniversity of Palermo · ITUniversity of Turin · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITIstituto Oncologico Veneto · ITLuigi Sacco Hospital · ITOspedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine · ITUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused increased interest in the application of telehealth to provide care without exposing patients and physicians to the risk of contagion. The urological literature on the topic is sparse.

objectiveTo perform a systematic review of the literature and evaluate all the available studies on urological applications of telehealth. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: After registration on PROSPERO, we searched PubMed and Scopus databases to collect any kind of studies evaluating any telehealth interventions in any urological conditions. The National Toxicology Program/Office of Health Assessment and Translation Risk of Bias Rating Tool for Human and Animal Studies was used to estimate the risk of bias. A narrative synthesis was performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We identified 45 studies (11 concerning prostate cancer [PCa], three hematuria management, six urinary stones, 14 urinary incontinence [UI], five urinary tract infections [UTIs], and six other conditions), including 12 randomized controlled trials. The available literature indicates that telemedicine has been implemented successfully in several common clinical scenarios, including the decision-making process following a diagnosis of nonmetastatic PCa, follow-up care of patients with localized PCa after curative treatments, initial diagnosis of hematuria, management diagnosis and follow-up care of uncomplicated urinary stones and uncomplicated UTIs, and initial evaluation, behavioral therapies, and pelvic floor muscle training in UI patients, as well as follow-up care after surgical treatments of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. The methodological quality of most of the reports was good.

conclusionsTelehealth has been implemented successfully in selected patients with PCa, UI, pelvic organ prolapse, uncomplicated urinary stones, and UTIs. Many urological conditions are suitable for telehealth, but more studies are needed on other highly prevalent urological malignant and benign conditions. Likely, the COVID-19 pandemic will give a significant boost to the use of telemedicine. More robust data on long-term efficacy, safety, and health economics are necessary. PATIENT SUMMARY: The diffusion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections has recently increased the interest in telehealth, which is the adoption of telecommunication to deliver any health care activity. The available literature indicates that telemedicine has been adopted successfully in selected patients with several common clinical urological conditions, including prostate cancer, uncomplicated urinary stones, uncomplicated urinary infections, urinary incontinence, or pelvic organ prolapse. Likely, the COVID-19 pandemic will give a significant boost to the use of telemedicine, but more robust data on long-term efficacy, safety, and costs are necessary.

Indexed as

PandemicsTelemedicineUrologyCOVID-19Decision MakingHematuriaHumansMalePelvic Organ ProlapseProstatic NeoplasmsSARS-CoV-2Urinary CalculiUrinary IncontinenceUrinary Tract InfectionsCoronavirusCOVID-19E-healthSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2TelehealthTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32616405
PMCPMC7301090
OpenAlexW3036837683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.