How should the political animals of the 21st century feel?: Comment on "The sense of should: A biologically-based framework for modelling social pressure" by J.E. Theriault et al.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The shallow of your smile: the ethics of expressive vocal deep-fakes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
   Article
2. Situating and extending the sense of should: Reply to comments on "The sense of should: A biologically-based framework for modeling social pressure".Physics of life reviews · 2021
   Article
3. Visceral politics: a theoretical and empirical proof of concept.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The sense of should: A biologically-based framework for modeling social pressure.2021

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as