ReviewPoultry science2020
Literature review: spectral imaging applied to poultry products.
Review in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated omics analysis reveals the age-dependent dynamic changes of gut microbiota and metabolites in layer chickens.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Metal loss defect detection and depth estimation using multi-spectral image analysis of cooling excited steel specimen with corrosion.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Biological Traits and Comprehensive Genomic Analysis of NovelMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Safely and autonomously cutting meat with a collaborative robot arm.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Metabolic response of broiler chickens to different doses ofCanadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2024Article
- Deep machine learning identified fish flesh using multispectral imaging.Current research in food science · 2024Article
- Recognition of Abnormal-Laying Hens Based on Fast Continuous Wavelet and Deep Learning Using Hyperspectral Images.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Consumption of poultry products is increasing worldwide, leading to an increased demand for safe, fresh, high-quality products. To ensure consumer safety and meet quality standards, poultry products must be routinely checked for fecal matter, food fraud, microbiological contamination, physical defects, and product quality. However, traditional screening methods are insufficient in providing real-time, nondestructive, chemical and spatial information about poultry products. Novel techniques, such as hyperspectral imaging (HSI), are being developed to acquire real-time chemical and spatial information about products without destruction of samples to ensure safety of products and prevent economic losses. This literature review provides a comprehensive overview of HSI applications to poultry products. The studies used for this review were found using the Google Scholar database by searching the following terms and their synonyms: "poultry" and "hyperspectral imaging". A total of 67 studies were found to meet the criteria. After all relevant literature was compiled, studies were grouped into categories based on the specific material or characteristic of interest to be detected, identified, predicted, or quantified by HSI. Studies were found for each of the following categories: food fraud, fecal matter detection, microbiological contamination, physical defects, and product quality. Key findings and technological advancements were briefly summarized and presented for each category. Since the first application to poultry products 20 yr ago, HSI has been shown to be a successful alternative to traditional screening methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.