Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32616031›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2020

Surgical workflow simulation for the design and assessment of operating room setups in orthopedic surgery.

Juliane Neumann, Christine Angrick, Celina Höhn, Dirk Zajonz, Mohamed Ghanem, Andreas Roth, Thomas Neumuth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neural digital twins: reconstructing complex medical environments for spatial planning in virtual reality.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Optimising Complex Surgical Trays Based on PDSA Cycles.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juliane NeumannInnovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery (ICCAS), Leipzig University, Semmelweisstr. 14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. Juliane.Neumann@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5696-9473
Christine AngrickInnovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery (ICCAS), Leipzig University, Semmelweisstr. 14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Celina HöhnInnovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery (ICCAS), Leipzig University, Semmelweisstr. 14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Dirk ZajonzDepartment of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Division of Endoprothetic Joint Surgery and General Orthopaedics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Mohamed GhanemDepartment of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Division of Endoprothetic Joint Surgery and General Orthopaedics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Andreas RothDepartment of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Division of Endoprothetic Joint Surgery and General Orthopaedics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Thomas NeumuthInnovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery (ICCAS), Leipzig University, Semmelweisstr. 14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe design and internal layout of modern operating rooms (OR) are influencing the surgical team's collaboration and communication, ergonomics, as well as intraoperative hygiene substantially. Yet, there is no objective method for the assessment and design of operating room setups for different surgical disciplines and intervention types available. The aim of this work is to establish an improved OR setup for common procedures in arthroplasty.

methodsWith the help of computer simulation, a method for the design and assessment of enhanced OR setups was developed. New OR setups were designed, analyzed in a computer simulation environment and evaluated in the actual intraoperative setting. Thereby, a 3D graphical simulation representation enabled the strong involvement of clinical stakeholders in all phases of the design and decision-making process of the new setup alternatives.

resultsThe implementation of improved OR setups reduces the instrument handover time between the surgeon and the scrub nurse, the travel paths of the OR team as well as shortens the procedure duration. Additionally, the ergonomics of the OR staff were improved.

conclusionThe developed simulation method was evaluated in the actual intraoperative setting and proved its benefit for the design and optimization of OR setups for different surgical intervention types. As a clinical result, enhanced setups for total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty surgeries were established in daily clinical routine and the OR efficiency was improved.

Indexed as

Orthopedic ProceduresComputer SimulationHumansOperating RoomsSurgeonsWorkflowDiscrete event simulationOperating room managementSurgical process optimizationSurgical workflow simulation

Identifiers

PMID32616031
PMCPMC7333415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.