Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32616017›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

Protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing wound COmplications in elective midline laparotomies after FAscia Closure using two different Techniques Of Running sutures: COFACTOR trial.

Mohamad Hadi El Charif, Zeina Hassan, Jamal Hoballah, Mohamad Khalife, Eman Sbaity

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03527433 (A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Wound COmplications in Elective Midline Laparotomies After FAscia Closure Using Two Different Techniques of Running Sutures), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03527433 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Wound COmplications in Elective Midline Laparotomies After FAscia Closure Using Two Different Techniques of Running Sutures: COFACTOR-trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmerican University of Beirut Medical CenterRan2019 to 2025Enrolled274ConditionsWound ComplicationArmsNew closure technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohamad Hadi El CharifDepartment of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El Solh, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon.
Zeina HassanDepartment of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El Solh, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon.
Jamal HoballahDepartment of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El Solh, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon.
Mohamad KhalifeDepartment of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El Solh, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon.
Eman SbaityDepartment of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El Solh, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon. es25@aub.edu.lb.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2969-4782
American University of Beirut Medical Center · LB

Funding

Genetic and Metabolic Determinants of 25(OH)D levels at Baseline and One Year: Findings from a Dose Ranging Vitamin D trialD43TW009118 · FIC · AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT · PI FULEIHAN, GHADA ELHAJJ · 2012 to 2024
$2.5M
American University of Beirut 11.320155.51113.11487.720.9999.0000FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWound complications following midline laparotomies are common and the main source of postoperative morbidity including superficial or deep wound infection, skin dehiscence, fascia dehiscence, and incisional hernia. Abdominal closure complications are strongly associated with suture technique and material, in addition to other factors related to the patient and type of surgery performed. The traditional technique is to place the fascia sutures 1 cm apart and at least 1 cm away from the fascia edge. A Swedish study described a new technique of placing the sutures 5 mm apart and 5 mm away from the fascia edge, resulting in lower rates of abdominal wound complications. This study has a number of limitations. There is a need for improved quality evidence to convince the surgical community to change the closure technique of abdominal wounds aiming to reduce morbidity, which is exemplified in incisional hernias and other various postop complications.

methodsThis is a 1:1 randomized, controlled, patient- and assessor-blinded, parallel design, superiority trial, with a primary endpoint of incisional hernia at 1 year. The study will be conducted at AUBMC over a 3-year period. Patients planned for a non-emergent midline laparotomy for general surgery or vascular procedure will be randomized to either fascia closure technique. In order to detect a drop of 12% in the incidence of incisional hernia, with 80% power and an alpha of 0.05, we will need to recruit 114 patients per arm. After adjusting for loss to follow-up, target recruitment is 274 subjects. We will compare both arms for the primary, secondary, and exploratory outcomes, using chi-square or t test as appropriate. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression will be done. DISCUSSION: This trial will assess postop complications following abdominal midline wound closures via two different suturing techniques. This trial will generate evidence-based conclusions that will allow surgeons to assess the role of a new abdominal closure technique in decreasing short- and long-term postoperative complications, for a commonly performed procedure.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03527433 . Registered on 17 May 2018 before starting participant enrollment.

Indexed as

Abdominal Wound Closure TechniquesDouble-Blind MethodElective Surgical ProceduresEquivalence Trials as TopicHernia, AbdominalHumansIncisional HerniaLaparotomyLebanonPostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSuture TechniquesAbdominal fascia closureIncisional herniasMidline laparotomiesRandomized controlled trialWound suture

Identifiers

PMID32616017
PMCPMC7330541
OpenAlexW3038475439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.