Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32616009›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Food supplements to reduce stunting in Pakistan: a process evaluation of community dynamics shaping uptake.

Shehla Zaidi, Jai K Das, Gul Nawaz Khan, Rabia Najmi, Mashal Murad Shah, Sajid B Soofi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02422953 (Effectiveness of Food/Nutrient Based Interventions to Prevent Stunting Among Children Under Five in Thatta and Sujawal Districts, Sindh Province, Pakistan), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02422953 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of Food/Nutrient Based Interventions to Prevent Stunting Among Children Under Five in Thatta and Sujawal Districts, Sindh Province, Pakistan

TypeinterventionalSponsorAga Khan UniversityRan2014 to 2018Enrolled4,020ConditionsMalnutritionArmsWheat Soya Blend (WSB), Wawa Mum, Micronutrient Powders (MNP), Behavior change and preventive health massages
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Effect of Information Communication on Micronutrient Powders (orSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shehla ZaidiDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. Shehla.zaidi@aku.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7620-9247
Jai K DasDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Gul Nawaz KhanDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Rabia NajmiDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mashal Murad ShahDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sajid B SoofiDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Aga Khan University · PK

Funding

World Food Program Grant # PAK/2014/005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is an increasing interest in use of food supplements to prevent childhood stunting, however the evidence on the process indicators is scarce. We in this study explore the barriers to the effective implementation of food supplementation programs and the possible mitigation strategies which can guide the design of future programs.

methodsWe undertook a process evaluation of a stunting prevention food supplementation pilot program in rural Pakistan that distributed Wheat Soy Blend (WSB) to pregnant & lactating women, and Lipid-based Nutrient Supplement (LNS) and micronutrient powder (MNP) to < 5 years children. We used a mixed methods approach through a quantitative survey of 800 households and conducted 18 focused group discussion (FGDs) (with male and female caregivers), 4 FGDs (with Community Health Workers (CHWs)) and 22 key informant interviews (with district stakeholders) to evaluate the community side factors affecting uptake through five parameters: value, acceptability, receipt of supplement, usage and correct dosage.

resultsThe findings show that proportionately few beneficiaries consumed the full dose of supplements, despite reasonable knowledge amongst caregivers. Sharing of supplements with other household member was common, and the full monthly stock was usually not received. Qualitative findings suggest that caregivers did not associate food supplements with stunting prevention. WSB was well accepted as an extra ration, LNS was popular due its chocolaty taste and texture, whereas MNP sprinkles were perceived to be of little value. The cultural food practices led to common sharing, whereas interaction with CHWs was minimal for nutrition counselling. Qualitative findings also indicate CHWs related programmatic constraints of low motivation, multi-tasking, inadequate counselling skills and weak supervision.

conclusionWe conclude that the community acceptability of food supplements does not translate into optimal consumption. Hence a greater emphasis is needed on context specific demand creation and focusing on the supply side constraints with improved logistical planning, enhanced motivation and supervision of community workers with involvement of multiple stakeholders. While, similar studies are needed in varying contexts to help frame universal guidelines.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02422953 . Registered on April 22, 2015.

Indexed as

AdultChildChild, PreschoolCommunity Health WorkersDietary SupplementsFemaleGrowth DisordersHumansInfantLactationMaleMicronutrientsPakistanPregnancyProcess Assessment, Health CareRural PopulationMicronutrientsAcceptabilityCommunity health workersFood supplementsStuntingUsage

Identifiers

PMID32616009
PMCPMC7331235
OpenAlexW3040083724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.