ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020
Prediction of heart disease and classifiers' sensitivity analysis.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 166 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating Large-Scale Data Analytics for Cardiovascular Disease Prediction: A Scoping Review.Healthcare informatics research · 2025Article
- Application of computed tomography angiography imaging in coronary heart disease screening and analysis of associated risk factors.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Understanding Arteriosclerotic Heart Disease Patients Using Electronic Health Records: A Machine Learning and Shapley Additive exPlanations Approach.Healthcare informatics research · 2023Article
- IoT-Enabled Classification of Echocardiogram Images for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction with Pre-Trained Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Model to Predict Heartbeat Rate Using Deep Learning Algorithms.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Using Recurrent Neural Networks for Predicting Type-2 Diabetes from Genomic and Tabular Data.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Efficacy of Machine-Learning-Supported Smart System for Heart Disease Prediction.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Covid19-Mexican-Patients' Dataset (Covid19MPD) Classification and Prediction Using Feature Importance.Concurrency and computation : practice & experience · 2022Article
- Machine-Learning Techniques for Feature Selection and Prediction of Mortality in Elderly CABG Patients.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Intelligent Cardiovascular Disease Prediction Empowered with Gradient Descent Optimization.Heliyon · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeart disease (HD) is one of the most common diseases nowadays, and an early diagnosis of such a disease is a crucial task for many health care providers to prevent their patients for such a disease and to save lives. In this paper, a comparative analysis of different classifiers was performed for the classification of the Heart Disease dataset in order to correctly classify and or predict HD cases with minimal attributes. The set contains 76 attributes including the class attribute, for 1025 patients collected from Cleveland, Hungary, Switzerland, and Long Beach, but in this paper, only a subset of 14 attributes are used, and each attribute has a given set value. The algorithms used K- Nearest Neighbor (K-NN), Naive Bayes, Decision tree J48, JRip, SVM, Adaboost, Stochastic Gradient Decent (SGD) and Decision Table (DT) classifiers to show the performance of the selected classifications algorithms to best classify, and or predict, the HD cases.
resultsIt was shown that using different classification algorithms for the classification of the HD dataset gives very promising results in term of the classification accuracy for the K-NN (K = 1), Decision tree J48 and JRip classifiers with accuracy of classification of 99.7073, 98.0488 and 97.2683% respectively. A feature extraction method was performed using Classifier Subset Evaluator on the HD dataset, and results show enhanced performance in term of the classification accuracy for K-NN (N = 1) and Decision Table classifiers to 100 and 93.8537% respectively after using the selected features by only applying a combination of up to 4 attributes instead of 13 attributes for the predication of the HD cases.
conclusionDifferent classifiers were used and compared to classify the HD dataset, and we concluded the benefit of having a reliable feature selection method for HD disease prediction with using minimal number of attributes instead of having to consider all available ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.