Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32615922›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Genomic characterization of the most barotolerant Listeria monocytogenes RO15 strain compared to reference strains used to evaluate food high pressure processing.

Ilhan Cem Duru, Margarita Andreevskaya, Pia Laine, Tone Mari Rode, Anne Ylinen, Trond Løvdal, Nadav Bar, Peter Crauwels, Christian U Riedel, Florentina Ionela Bucur and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Impact of High-Pressure Processing (HPP) onFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ilhan Cem DuruInstitute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. ilhan.duru@helsinki.fi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3409-5215
Margarita AndreevskayaInstitute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4052-3861
Pia LaineInstitute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3727-8749
Tone Mari RodeDepartment of Process Technology, Nofima - Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8695-2920
Anne YlinenInstitute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7423-7789
Trond LøvdalDepartment of Process Technology, Nofima - Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9155-5698
Nadav BarDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Peter CrauwelsInstitute of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Ulm, University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Christian U RiedelInstitute of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Ulm, University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7134-7085
Florentina Ionela BucurFaculty of Food Science and Engineering, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Galati, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0488-8524
Anca Ioana NicolauFaculty of Food Science and Engineering, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Galati, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8018-1478
Petri AuvinenInstitute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3947-4778

Funding

Academy of Finland 307856Academy of Finland 311717ERA-IB2 ERA-IB-16-247 014German Ministry for Education and Research 031B0268International and European Cooperation 250 Subprogramme 3.2 - Horizon 2020 - Contract No. 15/2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh pressure processing (HPP; i.e. 100-600 MPa pressure depending on product) is a non-thermal preservation technique adopted by the food industry to decrease significantly foodborne pathogens, including Listeria monocytogenes, from food. However, susceptibility towards pressure differs among diverse strains of L. monocytogenes and it is unclear if this is due to their intrinsic characteristics related to genomic content. Here, we tested the barotolerance of 10 different L. monocytogenes strains, from food and food processing environments and widely used reference strains including clinical isolate, to pressure treatments with 400 and 600 MPa. Genome sequencing and genome comparison of the tested L. monocytogenes strains were performed to investigate the relation between genomic profile and pressure tolerance.

resultsNone of the tested strains were tolerant to 600 MPa. A reduction of more than 5 log

conclusionsL. monocytogenes strain RO15 was the most pressure tolerant among the selected strains. Genome comparison suggests that there might be a relationship between prophages and pressure tolerance in L. monocytogenes.

Indexed as

Food PreservationGenome, BacterialCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA MethylationGenomicsListeria monocytogenesMicrobial ViabilityPressureReference StandardsRNA-SeqComparative genomicsCRISPRFoodborne pathogenHigh-pressure processing (HPP)PacBioPan-genome

Identifiers

PMID32615922
PMCPMC7331262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.