Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32615884›Full record

ArticleJournal of health communication2020

Communal Innovations: Inspiring Neighborhoods of Hope and Advocacy.

Rachel A Smith, Youllee Kim, Stephen A Matthews, Eleanore D Sternberg, Dimi Théodore Doudou, Matthew B Thomas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health communication, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachel A SmithDepartment of Communication Arts and Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University , University Park, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2407-7515
Youllee KimDepartment of Communication Arts and Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University , University Park, PA, USA.
Stephen A MatthewsDepartment of Sociology and Criminology and the Department of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University , University Park, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1645-4854
Eleanore D SternbergDepartment of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University , University Park, PA, USA.
Dimi Théodore DoudouCentre de recherche pour le Développement (CRD)/Laboratoire de Santé, Nutrition et Hygiène, Université Alassane Ouattara , Bouaké, Côte d'Ivoire.
Matthew B ThomasDepartment of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University , University Park, PA, USA.
Pennsylvania State University · USUniversité Alassane Ouattara · CI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innovations promise a better future, which may generate feelings of hope and inspire advocacy. Some innovations are more communal in nature: attempting to address a social problem, through community engagement and wide-spread adoption. For such innovations, the social processes that involve collective aspects of community life may play important roles in fostering hope and interpersonal advocacy. This study uses communication infrastructure theory and discrete emotions theory to investigate hope and advocacy within a field trial for a salient, visible, community-bound innovation to reduce transmission of malaria. Heads of households in one community (

Indexed as

Diffusion of InnovationResidence CharacteristicsAdultAfrica, WesternAgedConsumer AdvocacyFemaleHopeHumansMalariaMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID32615884
PMCPMC7454529
OpenAlexW3038728107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.