Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32615788›Full record

ArticleCephalalgia : an international journal of headache2020

Ubrogepant does not induce latent sensitization in a preclinical model of medication overuse headache.

Edita Navratilova, Sasan Behravesh, Janice Oyarzo, David W Dodick, Pradeep Banerjee, Frank Porreca

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Clinical evaluation of zavegepant for the acute treatment of migraine.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Medication-overuse headache: a narrative review.The journal of headache and pain · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Update of Gepants in the Treatment of Chronic Migraine.Current pain and headache reports · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. A prolactin-dependent sexually dimorphic mechanism of migraine chronification.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Edita NavratilovaDepartment of Pharmacology, Arizona Health Sciences Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1497-125X
Sasan BehraveshDepartment of Collaborative Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Janice OyarzoDepartment of Collaborative Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
David W DodickDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Pradeep BanerjeeAllergan plc, Madison, NJ, USA.
Frank PorrecaDepartment of Pharmacology, Arizona Health Sciences Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity of Arizona · USAllergan (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUbrogepant, a small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, was recently approved as an oral medication for the acute treatment of migraine. This study aimed to determine whether ubrogepant shows efficacy in a preclinical model of migraine-like pain and whether repeated oral administration of ubrogepant induces latent sensitization relevant to medication overuse headache in rats.

methodsA "two-hit" priming model of medication overuse headache was used. Female Sprague-Dawley rats received six oral doses of sumatriptan 10 mg/kg over 2 weeks to induce latent sensitization (i.e. "priming"). Cutaneous allodynia was measured periodically over 20 days in the periorbital and hindpaw regions using von Frey filaments. The rats were then subjected to a 1-hour bright light stress challenge on two consecutive days. At the start of the second bright light stress exposure, oral sumatriptan 10 mg/kg, oral ubrogepant 25, 50, or 100 mg/kg, or vehicle was administered; thereafter, cephalic and hindpaw sensory thresholds were monitored hourly over 5 hours to determine the efficacy of ubrogepant in reversing bright light stress-induced cutaneous allodynia. A dose of ubrogepant effective in the medication overuse headache model (100 mg/kg) was then selected to determine if repeated administration would produce latent sensitization. Rats were administered six oral doses of ubrogepant 100 mg/kg, sumatriptan 10 mg/kg (positive control), or vehicle over 2 weeks, and cutaneous allodynia was evaluated regularly. Testing continued until mechanosensitivity returned to baseline levels. Rats were then challenged with bright light stress on days 20 and 21, and periorbital and hindpaw cutaneous allodynia was measured. On days 28 to 32, the same groups received a nitric oxide donor (sodium nitroprusside 3 mg/kg, i.p.), and cutaneous allodynia was assessed hourly over 5 hours.

resultsSumatriptan elicited cutaneous allodynia in both cephalic and hindpaw regions; cutaneous allodynia resolved to baseline levels after cessation of drug administration (14 days). Sumatriptan priming resulted in generalized and delayed cutaneous allodynia, evoked by either bright light stress (day 21) or nitric oxide donor (day 28). Ubrogepant dose-dependently blocked both stress- and nitric oxide donor-induced cephalic and hindpaw allodynia in the sumatriptan-induced medication overuse headache model with a 50% effective dose of ∼50 mg/kg. Unlike sumatriptan, ubrogepant 100 mg/kg in repeated effective doses did not produce cutaneous allodynia or latent sensitization.

conclusionsBoth ubrogepant and sumatriptan demonstrated efficacy as acute medications for stress- and nitric oxide donor-evoked cephalic allodynia in a preclinical model of medication overuse headache, consistent with their clinical efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine. However, in contrast to sumatriptan, repeated treatment with ubrogepant did not induce cutaneous allodynia or latent sensitization. These studies suggest ubrogepant may offer an effective acute treatment of migraine without risk of medication overuse headache.

Indexed as

Headache Disorders, SecondaryAnalgesicsAnimalsCentral Nervous System SensitizationDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHyperalgesiaPyridinesPyrrolesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySumatriptanAnalgesicsPyridinesPyrrolesSumatriptanubrogepantallodyniaMedication overuse headachemigrainesumatriptanubrogepant

Identifiers

PMID32615788
PMCPMC7412872
OpenAlexW3040356291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.