Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32615623›Full record

ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2021

[Acceptance of Care Offers for exclusive Remote Treatment Illustrated by the Telemedical Model Project "docdirekt" with a Mixed-Methods Design].

Michail von Solodkoff, Christoph Strumann, Jost Steinhäuser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Transparency and Efficiency through Digital Healthcare? Results of a Survey of Generation Y].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2024
    Article
  5. Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Technology Acceptance and Its Applications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. [Assessing Electronic Prescription: A Cross-sectional Study of Pharmacists in Germany].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michail von SolodkoffInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck.
Christoph StrumannInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck.
Jost SteinhäuserInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCurrent telemedical services, such as the "docdirekt" project in Baden-Württemberg (BW), are evaluated for optimizing their implementation. Based on the results of this evaluation, strategies for adapting these services for exclusive remote treatment are identified that enable their integration in regular medical care.

methodsIn the first part of the study, citizens from BW were individually interviewed on their expectations regarding such a project, and the advantages and barriers in the use of services for exclusive remote treatment. Determinants were explored by means of Mayring's qualitative content analysis. In the second part of the study, these determinants were prioritized by using a quantitative survey of randomly selected citizens from BW.

resultsA total of 27 subjects (mean age 51 years, min: 23 years, max: 86 years) participated in the interviews. Most importantly, they found the direct accessibility of healthcare professionals a great advantage. A "24/7" hotline was found to be beneficial, as well as the possibility to get electronic prescriptions or medical sickness certificates. Privacy and a missing physical examination were perceived as barriers. In the questionnaire, the participants (n=217, return 10.9%, mean age: 53 years, min: 19 years, max: 88 years) rated a "direct medical contact" as the most important, followed by the "possibility to get a specialist" and to receive "a first therapy suggestion". In total, n=71 (34.6%) rejected the future use of such a service. The willingness to use the service decreased with increasing age and decreasing digital skills.

conclusionThe study shows that there is an interest in the use of services for exclusive remote treatment. People who intend to use telemedical service prioritize the fast-initial medical assessment and the comfort aspects and, among other things, consider the inclusion of additional services as beneficial. The next step is to incorporate these determinants into the existing telemedical service.

Indexed as

TelemedicineGermanyHumansMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32615623
PMCPMC7979317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.