Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32615514›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2020

Docking approaches for modeling multi-molecular assemblies.

Mireia Rosell, Juan Fernández-Recio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Molecular Dynamics and Other HPC Simulations for Drug Discovery.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Online bioinformatics teaching practice: Comparison of popular docking programs using SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD-ACE2 complex as a benchmark.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mireia RosellBarcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), 08034 Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ICVV), CSIC - Universidad de La Rioja - Gobierno de La Rioja, 26007 Logroño, Spain.
Juan Fernández-RecioBarcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), 08034 Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ICVV), CSIC - Universidad de La Rioja - Gobierno de La Rioja, 26007 Logroño, Spain. Electronic address: juan.fernandezrecio@icvv.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational docking approaches aim to overcome the limited availability of experimental structural data on protein-protein interactions, which are key in biology. The field is rapidly moving from the traditional docking methodologies for modeling of binary complexes to more integrative approaches using template-based, data-driven modeling of multi-molecular assemblies. We will review here the predictive capabilities of current docking methods in blind conditions, based on the results from the most recent community-wide blind experiments. Integration of template-based and ab initio docking approaches is emerging as the optimal strategy for modeling protein complexes and multimolecular assemblies. We will also review the new methodological advances on ab initio docking and integrative modeling.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProteinsMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingSoftwareProteins

Identifiers

PMID32615514
PMCPMC7324114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.