ArticleNeuroImage2020
Single-scale time-dependent window-sizes in sliding-window dynamic functional connectivity analysis: A validation study.
Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying affective state via clustering of temporal variability in limbic activity and mediating role of negative emotion.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- An evaluation of the efficacy of single-echo and multi-echo fMRI denoising strategies.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Temporal dynamic changes in functional connectivity of reward network in depressed adolescents and young adults with and without suicidal attempts.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Sex Differences in Functional Gradients and Dynamic Functional Connectivity in Preschool-Aged Children With ASD.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Sliding window functional connectivity inference with nonstationary autocorrelations and cross-correlations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- The value of linear and non-linear quantitative EEG analysis in paediatric epilepsy surgery: a machine learning approach.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Altered dynamic neural activities in individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder and comorbid depressive symptoms.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Evolution of brain network dynamics in early Parkinson's disease with mild cognitive impairment.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2023Article
- Decoding six basic emotions from brain functional connectivity patterns.Science China. Life sciences · 2023Article
- Multi-timepoint pattern analysis: Influence of personality and behavior on decoding context-dependent brain connectivity dynamics.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- LCTree-Based Approach for Mining Frequent Items in Real-Time.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Association of Plasma and Electroencephalography Markers With Motor Subtypes of Parkinson's Disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Aberrant functional brain network dynamics in patients with functional constipation.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- State-Dependent Effective Connectivity in Resting-State fMRI.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021Article
- Resting-State Static and Dynamic Functional Abnormalities in Active Professional Fighters With Repetitive Head Trauma and With Neuropsychological Impairments.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During the past ten years, dynamic functional connectivity (FC) has been extensively studied using the sliding-window method. A fixed window-size is usually selected heuristically, since no consensus exists yet on choice of the optimal window-size. Furthermore, without a known ground-truth, the validity of the computed dynamic FC remains unclear and questionable. In this study, we computed single-scale time-dependent (SSTD) window-sizes for the sliding-window method. SSTD window-sizes were based on the frequency content at every time point of a time series and were computed without any prior information. Therefore, they were time-dependent and data-driven. Using simulated sinusoidal time series with frequency shifts, we demonstrated that SSTD window-sizes captured the time-dependent period (inverse of frequency) information at every time point. We further validated the dynamic FC values computed with SSTD window-sizes with both a classification analysis using fMRI data with a low sampling rate and a regression analysis using fMRI data with a high sampling rate. Specifically, we achieved both a higher classification accuracy in predicting cognitive impairment status in fighters and a larger explained behavioral variance in healthy young adults when using dynamic FC matrices computed with SSTD window-sizes as features, as compared to using dynamic FC matrices computed with the conventional fixed window-sizes. Overall, our study computed and validated SSTD window-sizes in the sliding-window method for dynamic FC analysis. Our results demonstrate that dynamic FC matrices computed with SSTD window-sizes can capture more temporal dynamic information related to behavior and cognitive function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.