ArticlePloS one2020
Steady-state visually evoked potential is modulated by the difference of recognition condition.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Measuring attentional selection of object categories using hierarchical frequency tagging.Journal of vision · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent researches revealed that the EEG component caused by the flickering visual stimulus, which is called steady-state visually evoked potential (SSVEP), might be a potential index for object recognition. This study examined whether SSVEP reflects different states during object recognition. In one trial, a binary image (BI), which is difficult to recognize, was followed by a grayscale image (GI) of the same object as the answer. Both BI and GI were presented in a flickering manner at a frequency of 7.5 Hz. Participants were first asked to answer whether they could recognize BI. Then, after GI was shown, participants were requested to answer whether they recognized it. We analyzed the evoked and induced component of SSVEPs from the two recognition conditions. As a result, the SSVEPs to BI were significantly larger than that to GI. In addition, induced component to GI after the BI was unrecognized was smaller than after the BI was recognized. The present data provide evidence that SSVEPs reflect a transition of cognitive state to ambiguous figures is reflected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.