Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32614842›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Inferring transportation mode from smartphone sensors: Evaluating the potential of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth.

Andreas Bjerre-Nielsen, Kelton Minor, Piotr Sapieżyński, Sune Lehmann, David Dreyer Lassen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andreas Bjerre-NielsenCopenhagen Center for Social Data Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3057-5975
Kelton MinorCopenhagen Center for Social Data Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Piotr SapieżyńskiKhoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Sune LehmannCopenhagen Center for Social Data Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
David Dreyer LassenCopenhagen Center for Social Data Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding which transportation modes people use is critical for smart cities and planners to better serve their citizens. We show that using information from pervasive Wi-Fi access points and Bluetooth devices can enhance GPS and geographic information to improve transportation detection on smartphones. Wi-Fi information also improves the identification of transportation mode and helps conserve battery since it is already collected by most mobile phones. Our approach uses a machine learning approach to determine the mode from pre-prepocessed data. This approach yields an overall accuracy of 89% and average F1 score of 83% for inferring the three grouped modes of self-powered, car-based, and public transportation. When broken out by individual modes, Wi-Fi features improve detection accuracy of bus trips, train travel, and driving compared to GPS features alone and can substitute for GIS features without decreasing performance. Our results suggest that Wi-Fi and Bluetooth can be useful in urban transportation research, for example by improving mobile travel surveys and urban sensing applications.

Indexed as

City PlanningSmartphoneSupervised Machine LearningTransportationWireless TechnologyAccelerometryAutomobile DrivingDenmarkGeographic Information SystemsHumansMotor VehiclesRailroadsUrban PopulationWalking

Identifiers

PMID32614842
PMCPMC7332005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.