Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32614839›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

History of breastfeeding but not mode of delivery shapes the gut microbiome in childhood.

Camille C Cioffi, Hannah F Tavalire, Jenae M Neiderhiser, Brendan Bohannan, Leslie D Leve

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Interactions with alloparents are associated with the diversity of infant skin and fecal bacterial communities in Chicago, United States.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Host specificity of the gut microbiome.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2021
    Review
  16. Early-Life Development of the Bifidobacterial Community in the Infant Gut.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camille C CioffiUniversity of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2424-7473
Hannah F TavalireUniversity of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States of America.
Jenae M NeiderhiserThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States of America.
Brendan BohannanUniversity of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States of America.
Leslie D LeveUniversity of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States of America.
University of Oregon · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

The Early Growth and Development Study Pediatric CohortUH3OD023389 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI Jody M. Ganiban, Leslie Diane Leve · 2018 to 2026
$16.6M
The Early Growth and Development Study: Family Process, Genes and School EntryR01HD042608 · NICHD · OREGON SOCIAL LEARNING CENTER, INC. · PI CAPALDI, DEBORAH M. · 2002 to 2011
$14.9M
Siblings Reared Apart: A Naturalistic Cross-Fostering Study of Young ChildrenR01DA035062 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI LEVE, LESLIE DIANE · 2013 to 2016
$2.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD042608NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035062NIH HHS UH3 OD023389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe naïve neonatal gut is sensitive to early life experiences. Events during this critical developmental window may have life-long impacts on the gut microbiota. Two experiences that have been associated with variation in the gut microbiome in infancy are mode of delivery and feeding practices (eg, breastfeeding). It remains unclear whether these early experiences are responsible for microbial differences beyond toddlerhood.

aimsOur study examined whether mode of delivery and infant feeding practices are associated with differences in the child and adolescent microbiome. DESIGN, SUBJECTS, MEASURES: We used an adoption-sibling design to compare genetically related siblings who were reared together or apart. Gut microbiome samples were collected from 73 children (M = 11 years, SD = 3 years, range = 3-18 years). Parents reported on child breastfeeding history, age, sex, height, and weight. Mode of delivery was collected through medical records and phone interviews.

resultsNegative binomial mixed effects models were used to identify whether mode of delivery and feeding practices were related to differences in phylum and genus-level abundance of bacteria found in the gut of child participants. Covariates included age, sex, and body mass index. Genetic relatedness and rearing environment were accounted for as random effects. We observed a significant association between lack of breastfeeding during infancy and a greater number of the genus Bacteroides in stool in childhood and adolescence.

conclusionThe absence of breastfeeding may impart lasting effects on the gut microbiome well into childhood.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingGastrointestinal MicrobiomeInfant FormulaAdolescentBacteriaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMale

Identifiers

PMID32614839
PMCPMC7332026
OpenAlexW3039689527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.