Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32614835›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2020

-----Comparison of T1-Post and FLAIR-Post MRI for identification of traumatic meningeal enhancement in traumatic brain injury patients.

Tara S Davis, Jennifer E Nathan, Ana S Tinoco Martinez, Jill B De Vis, L Christine Turtzo, Lawrence L Latour

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01132937 (Evaluation, Pathogenesis, and Outcome of Subjects With or Suspected Traumatic Brain Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01132937 completednot on this map

Evaluation, Pathogenesis, and Outcome of Subjects With or Suspected Traumatic Brain Injury

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)Ran2010Enrolled886ConditionsTraumatic Brain Injury
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tara S DavisCenter for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6293-3602
Jennifer E NathanJohns Hopkins Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Ana S Tinoco MartinezCenter for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Jill B De VisNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
L Christine TurtzoNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5617-4753
Lawrence L LatourNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.

Funding

Eval, Pathogenesis, Outcome of Subjects with or Suspected Traumatic Brain InjuryZIANS003120 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI LATOUR, LAWRENCE · 2010 to 2025
$16.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic meningeal enhancement (TME) is a novel biomarker observed on post-contrast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) in patients who undergo contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after suspected traumatic brain injury (TBI). TME may be seen on acute MRI despite the absence of other trauma-related intracranial findings. In this study we compare conspicuity of TME on FLAIR post-contrast and T1 weighted imaging (T1WI) post-contrast, and investigate if TME is best detected by FLAIR post-contrast or T1WI post-contrast sequences. Subjects selected for analysis enrolled in the parent study (NCT01132937) in 2016 and underwent contrast-enhanced MRI within 48 hours of suspected TBI. Two blinded readers reviewed pairs of pre- and post-contrast T1WI and FLAIR images for presence or absence of TME. Discordant pairs between the two blinded readers were reviewed by a third reader. Cohen's kappa coefficient was used to calculate agreement. Twenty-five subjects (15 males, 10 females; median age 48 (Q1:35-Q3:62; IQR: 27)) were included. The blinded readers had high agreement for presence of TME on FLAIR (Kappa of 0.90), but had no agreement for presence of TME on T1WI (Kappa of -0.24). The FLAIR and T1WI scans were compared among all three readers and 62% of the cases positive on FLAIR could be seen on T1WI. However, 38% of the cases who were read positive on FLAIR for TME were read negative for TME on T1WI. Conspicuity of TME is higher on post-contrast FLAIR MRI than on post-contrast T1WI. TME as seen on post-contrast FLAIR MRI can aid in the identification of patients with TBI.

Indexed as

AdultBrain Injuries, TraumaticContrast MediaFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMeglumineMeningesMiddle AgedNeuroimagingOrganometallic CompoundsSingle-Blind MethodSubtraction TechniqueContrast Mediagadobenic acidMeglumineOrganometallic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID32614835
PMCPMC7332069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.