Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32614828›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Identifying thresholds for classifying moderate-to-heavy soil-transmitted helminth intensity infections for FECPAKG2, McMaster, Mini-FLOTAC and qPCR.

Bruno Levecke, Piet Cools, Marco Albonico, Shaali Ame, Cécile Angebault, Mio Ayana, Jerzy M Behnke, Jeffrey M Bethony, Giuseppe Cringoli, Daniel Dana and 25 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparison of FECPAKParasites & vectors · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Diagnostic Techniques for Soil-Transmitted Helminths - Recent Advances.Research and reports in tropical medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors at 19 institutions in 15 countries.

Bruno LeveckeDepartment of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8912-5595
Piet CoolsDepartment of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Marco AlbonicoCenter for Tropical Diseases, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy.
Shaali AmePublic Health Laboratory-Ivo de Carneri, Chake Chake, United Republic of Tanzania.
Cécile AngebaultClinical Laboratory, Institut Pasteur, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Mio AyanaJimma University Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Jerzy M BehnkeSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Jeffrey M BethonyMicrobiology, Immunology, and Tropical Medicine, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington D.C., United States of America.
Giuseppe CringoliDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Daniel DanaJimma University Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Bertrand GuillardClinical Laboratory, Institut Pasteur, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Nguyen Thi Viet HoaDepartment of Parasitology, National Institute of Malariology, Parasitology and Entomology, Ha Noi, Vietnam.
Gagandeep KangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Deepthi KattulaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Jennifer KeiserDepartment of Medical Parasitology and Infection Biology, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland & University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Andrew C KotzeDivision of Agriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, St. Lucia, Australia.
Leonardo F MatosoLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Immunology, Research Center René Rachou - FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9639-5179
Maria P MaurelliDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
James S McCarthyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Zeleke MekonnenJimma University Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Greg MiramsTechion Group Ltd, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Antonio MontresorDepartment of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Rodrigo Corrêa OliveiraLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Immunology, Research Center René Rachou - FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Maria V PeriagoLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Immunology, Research Center René Rachou - FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1470-5146
Simone A PintoLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Immunology, Research Center René Rachou - FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Laura RinaldiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Somphou SayasoneLao Tropical and Public Health Institute, Ministry of Health, Vientiane Capital, Lao People's Democratic Republic.
Laurentine SumoCentre for Schistosomiasis and Parasitology, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Louis-Albert Tchuem-TchuentéCentre for Schistosomiasis and Parasitology, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Dang Thi Cam ThachDepartment of Parasitology, National Institute of Malariology, Parasitology and Entomology, Ha Noi, Vietnam.
Eurion ThomasTechion Group Ltd, Aberystwyth, United Kingdom.
Ahmed ZeynudinJimma University Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Jaco J VerweijLaboratory for Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Johnny VlaminckDepartment of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Jozef VercruysseDepartment of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRGhent University · BEJimma University · ETUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITChristian Medical College, Vellore · INInstitut Pasteur du Cambodge · KHNational Institute of Malariology, Parasitology and Entomology · VNUniversité de Yaoundé I · CMAberystwyth University · GBAgriculture and Food · AUElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLGeorge Washington University · USMinistry of Health · LAOspedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria · ITPublic Health Laboratory Ivo de Carneri · TZSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Nottingham · GBWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) has defined moderate-to-heavy intensity (M&HI) infections with soil-transmitted helminths (Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura and the two hookworms, Ancylostoma duodenale and Necator americanus) based on specific values of eggs per gram of stool, as measured by the Kato-Katz method. There are a variety of novel microscopy and DNA-based methods but it remains unclear whether applying current WHO thresholds on to these methods allows for a reliable classification of M&HI infections. We evaluated both WHO and method-specific thresholds for classifying the M&HI infections for novel microscopic (FECPAKG2, McMaster and Mini-FLOTAC) and DNA-based (qPCR) diagnostic methods. For this, we determined method-specific thresholds that best classified M&HI infections (defined by Kato-Katz and WHO thresholds; reference method) in two multi-country drug efficacy studies. Subsequently, we verified whether applying these method-specific thresholds improved the agreement in classifying M&HI infections compared to the reference method. When we applied the WHO thresholds, the new microscopic methods mainly misclassified M&HI as low intensity, and to a lesser extent low intensity infection as M&HI. For FECPAKG2, applying the method-specific thresholds significantly improved the agreement for Ascaris (moderate → substantial), Trichuris and hookworms (fair → moderate). For Mini-FLOTAC, a significantly improved agreement was observed for hookworms only (fair → moderate). For the other STHs, the agreement was almost perfect and remained unchanged. For McMaster, the method-specific thresholds revealed a fair to a substantial agreement but did not significantly improve the agreement. For qPCR, the method-specific thresholds based on genome equivalents per ml of DNA moderately agreed with the reference method for hookworm and Trichuris infections. For Ascaris, there was a substantial agreement. We defined method-specific thresholds that improved the classification of M&HI infections. Validation studies are required before they can be recommended for general use in assessing M&HI infections in programmatic settings.

Indexed as

HelminthiasisHumansMicroscopyReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSoilWorld Health OrganizationSoil

Identifiers

PMID32614828
PMCPMC7413557
OpenAlexW3040424323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.