Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32614827›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Volunteer based approach to dog vaccination campaigns to eliminate human rabies: Lessons from Laikipia County, Kenya.

Adam W Ferguson, Dishon Muloi, Dedan K Ngatia, Wangechi Kiongo, Duncan M Kimuyu, Paul W Webala, Moses O Olum, Mathew Muturi, Samuel M Thumbi, Rosie Woodroffe and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Adam W FergusonGlobal Health Program, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6931-6420
Dishon MuloiUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences & Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Charlotte Auerbach Road,Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6236-2280
Dedan K NgatiaSchool of Natural Resources & Environmental Studies, Karatina University, Karatina, Kenya.
Wangechi KiongoSchool of Natural Resources & Environmental Studies, Karatina University, Karatina, Kenya.
Duncan M KimuyuSchool of Natural Resources & Environmental Studies, Karatina University, Karatina, Kenya.
Paul W WebalaDepartment of Forestry and Wildlife Management, Maasai Mara University, Narok, Kenya.
Moses O OlumKenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization, Muguga North,Kikuyu, Kenya.
Mathew MuturiKenya Zoonotic Disease Unit, Ministry of Health and Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Fisheries, Nairobi, Kenya.
Samuel M ThumbiPaul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.
Rosie WoodroffeInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, United Kingdom.
Lucy MurugiMinistry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Fisheries, County Government of Laikipia, Nanyuki, Kenya.
Eric M FèvreInternational Livestock Research Institute,Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-8931-4986
Suzan MurrayGlobal Health Program, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, United States of America.
Dino J MartinsMpala Research Centre, Nanyuki, Kenya.
Karatina University · KEMinistry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries · KESmithsonian Conservation Biology Institute · USCentre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution · GBKenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization · KEMaasai Mara University · KEPrinceton University · USUniversity of Liverpool · GBWashington State University · USZoological Society of London · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council G1100783Wellcome Trust 110330/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn estimated 59,000 people die from rabies annually, with 99% of those deaths attributable to bites from domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris). This preventable Neglected Tropical Disease has a large impact across continental Africa, especially for rural populations living in close contact with livestock and wildlife. Mass vaccinations of domestic dogs are effective at eliminating rabies but require large amounts of resources, planning, and political will to implement. Grassroots campaigns provide an alternative method to successful implementation of rabies control but remain understudied in their effectiveness to eliminate the disease from larger regions. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe report on the development, implementation, and effectiveness of a grassroots mass dog rabies vaccination campaign in Kenya, the Laikipia Rabies Vaccination Campaign. During 2015-2017, a total of 13,155 domestic dogs were vaccinated against rabies in 17 communities covering approximately 1500 km2. Based on an estimated population size of 34,275 domestic dogs, percent coverages increased across years, from 2% in 2015 to 24% in 2017, with only 3 of 38 community-years of vaccination exceeding the 70% target. The average cost of vaccinating an animal was $3.44 USD with in-kind contributions and $7.44 USD without in-kind contributions. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The evolution of the Laikipia Rabies Vaccination Campaign from a localized volunteer-effort to a large-scale program attempting to eliminate rabies at the landscape scale provides a unique opportunity to examine successes, failures, and challenges facing grassroots campaigns. Success, in the form of vaccinating more dogs across the study area, was relatively straightforward to achieve. However, lack of effective post-vaccination monitoring and education programs, limited funding, and working in diverse community types appeared to hinder achievement of 70% coverage levels. These results indicate that grassroots campaigns will inevitably be faced with a philosophical question regarding the value of local impacts versus their contributions to a larger effort to eliminate rabies at the regional, country, or global scale.

Indexed as

AnimalsCommunity-Institutional RelationsCosts and Cost AnalysisDogsHumansKenyaMass VaccinationPopulation DensityRabiesVolunteers

Identifiers

PMID32614827
PMCPMC7331976
OpenAlexW3038562523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.