Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32614434›Full record

ArticleCarcinogenesis2020

The interplay of growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) expression and M2 macrophages during prostate carcinogenesis.

Sudha M Sadasivan, Yalei Chen, Nilesh S Gupta, Xiaoxia Han, Kevin R Bobbitt, Dhananjay A Chitale, Sean R Williamson, Andrew G Rundle, Deliang Tang, Benjamin A Rybicki

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Carcinogenesis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hallmarks of Cancer Cachexia: Sexual Dimorphism in Related Pathways.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Macrophages as a Source and Target of GDF-15.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sudha M SadasivanDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Detroit, MI, USA.
Yalei ChenDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Detroit, MI, USA.
Nilesh S GuptaPathology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Xiaoxia HanDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Detroit, MI, USA.
Kevin R BobbittDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Detroit, MI, USA.
Dhananjay A ChitalePathology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Sean R WilliamsonPathology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Andrew G RundleDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Deliang TangEnvironmental Heath Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Benjamin A RybickiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Detroit, MI, USA.
Henry Ford Hospital · USColumbia University · US

Funding

GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION IN PROSTATE CANCERR01ES011126 · NIEHS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI RYBICKI, BENJAMIN A. · 2000 to 2017
$8.0M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES011126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

M2 (tumor-supportive) macrophages may upregulate growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), which is highly expressed in prostate tumors, but the combined utility of these markers as prognostic biomarkers are unclear. We retrospectively studied 90 prostate cancer cases that underwent radical prostatectomy as their primary treatment and were followed for biochemical recurrence (BCR). These cases also had a benign prostate biopsy at least 1 year or more before their prostate cancer surgery. Using computer algorithms to analyze digitalized immunohistochemically stained slides, GDF15 expression and the presence of M2 macrophages based on the relative density of CD204- and CD68-positive macrophages were measured in prostate: (i) benign biopsy, (ii) cancer and (iii) tumor-adjacent benign (TAB) tissue. Both M2 macrophages (P = 0.0004) and GDF15 (P < 0.0001) showed significant inter-region expression differences. Based on a Cox proportional hazards model, GDF15 expression was not associated with BCR but, in men where GDF15 expression differences between cancer and TAB were highest, the risk of BCR was significantly reduced (hazard ratio = 0.26; 95% confidence interval = 0.09-0.94). In addition, cases with high levels of M2 macrophages in prostate cancer had almost a 5-fold increased risk of BCR (P = 0.01). Expression of GDF15 in prostate TAB was associated with M2 macrophage levels in both prostate cancer and TAB and appeared to moderate M2-macrophage-associated BCR risk. In summary, the relationship of GDF15 expression and CD204-positive M2 macrophage levels is different in a prostate tumor environment compared with an earlier benign biopsy and, collectively, these markers may predict aggressive disease.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinogenesisCell CountGrowth Differentiation Factor 15HumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstateProstatic NeoplasmsTumor-Associated MacrophagesGDF15 protein, humanGrowth Differentiation Factor 15

Identifiers

PMID32614434
PMCPMC7422623
OpenAlexW3038226937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.