Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32614422›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2020

Association of Atrial Fibrillation Episode Duration With Arrhythmia Recurrence Following Ablation: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jason G Andrade, Marc W Deyell, Atul Verma, Laurent Macle, Jean Champagne, Peter Leong-Sit, Paul Novak, Mariano Badra-Verdu, John Sapp, Paul Khairy and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01913522 (Cryoballoon vs. Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01913522 nacompletednot on this map

Cryoballoon vs. Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: The Effect of Double Short vs. Standard Exposure Cryoablation Duration During Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2014 to 2019Enrolled348ConditionsParoxysmal Atrial FibrillationArmsPulmonary Vein Isolation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pre-procedural time spent in atrial fibrillation using intermittent ECG monitoring is associated with arrhythmia recurrence after ablation: the ISOLATION cohort study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in elderly and very elderly patients: safety, outcomes, and quality of life.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. [Characterization of atrial fibrillation burden using wearables].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2024
    Review
  16. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jason G AndradeMontreal Heart Institute, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Marc W DeyellDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Atul VermaSouthlake Regional Health Center, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada.
Laurent MacleMontreal Heart Institute, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Jean ChampagneUniversité Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Peter Leong-SitUniversity of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Paul NovakRoyal Jubilee Hospital, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Mariano Badra-VerduCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
John SappQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Paul KhairyMontreal Heart Institute, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Stanley NattelMontreal Heart Institute, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Contemporary guidelines recommend that atrial fibrillation (AF) be classified based on episode duration, with these categories forming the basis of therapeutic recommendations. While pragmatic, these classifications are not based on pathophysiologic processes and may not reflect clinical outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the association of baseline AF episode duration with post-AF ablation arrhythmia outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: The current study is a secondary analysis of a prospective, parallel-group, multicenter, single-masked randomized clinical trial (the Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: Double Short vs Standard Exposure Duration [CIRCA-DOSE] study), which took place at 8 Canadian centers. Between September 2014 and July 2017, 346 patients older than 18 years with symptomatic AF referred for first catheter ablation were enrolled. All patients received an implantable cardiac monitor at least 30 days before ablation. Data analysis was performed in September 2019. Exposure: Before ablation, patients were classified based on their longest AF episode. Ablation consisted of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation using standard techniques. Main Outcomes and Measures: Time to first recurrence of symptomatic or asymptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia (AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia) following ablation and AF burden (percentage of time in AF) on preablation and postablation continuous rhythm monitoring. Results: The study included 346 patients (mean [SD] age, 59 [10] years; 231 [67.7%] men). Overall, 263 patients (76.0%) had AF episode duration of less than 24 hours; 25 (7.2%), 24 to 48 hours; 40 (11.7%), 2 to 7 days; and 18 (5.2%), more than 7 days. Documented recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia following ablation was significantly lower in patients with baseline AF episode duration of less than 24 continuous hours compared with those with longer AF episodes (24 hours vs 24-48 hours: hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.21-0.80; P = .009; 24 hours vs 2-7 days: HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.14-0.45; P < .001; 24 hours vs >7 days: HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.09-0.55; P < .001). Patients with preablation AF episodes limited to less than 24 continuous hours had a significantly lower median (interquartile range) postablation AF burden (0% [0%-0.1%]) compared with those with AF preablation episodes lasting 2-7 days (0.1% [0%-1.0%]; P = .003) and those with AF preablation episodes lasting more than 7 days (1.0% [0%-5.4%]; P = .008). There was no significant difference in arrhythmia recurrence or AF burden between the 3 groups with a baseline AF episode duration of longer than 24 hours. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, patients with AF episodes limited to less than 24 continuous hours had a significantly lower incidence of arrhythmia recurrence following AF ablation. This suggests that current guidelines for classification of AF may not reflect clinical outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01913522.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationElectrocardiography, AmbulatoryCanadaData Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerioperative PeriodPrognosisRecurrenceTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32614422
PMCPMC7333024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.