SynthesisJAMA network open2020
Incidence of Occult Spinal Dysraphism Among Infants With Cutaneous Stigmata and Proportion Managed With Neurosurgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and MR neuroimaging features of lumbosacral spinal malformations: a tertiary care institutional experience in south India.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Microsurgical Untethering of Pediatric Lipomyelomeningocele: A Stepwise, Photo-Illustrated Technical Note.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Tethered cord syndrome and pediatric scoliosis: workup, natural history, and surgical timing.Spine deformity · 2026Review
- Evaluating occult spinal dysraphism in children with midline cutaneous lesions: when to image?Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Cutaneous stigmata indicative of occult spinal dysraphism in two ancient Roman statues.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Diagnostic Utility of Spinal Ultrasound in Neonates With a Simple Sacral Dimple: An Eight-Year Retrospective Study.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026Article
- Dorsal ectopic breast-a cutaneous marker of occult spinal dysraphism.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
- Spinal dysraphism in congenital scoliosis and kyphosis: a retrospective analysis in an Indian population.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Caudal Regression Syndrome First Diagnosed in Adulthood: A Case Report and a Review of the Literature.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- International Consensus Statement on the Radiological Evaluation of Dysraphic Malformations of the Spine and Spinal Cord.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Review
- Tethered spinal cord tension assessed via ultrasound elastography in computational and intraoperative human studies.Communications medicine · 2024Article
- Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Screening of Closed Spinal Dysraphism.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2023Article
- Developmental Abnormalities of the Pediatric Spine: A Review of the Correlation Between Ultrasound and MRI Findings.Cureus · 2023Review
- Article
- Multidisciplinary Management of Children with Occult Spinal Dysraphism: A Comprehensive Journey from Birth to Adulthood.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Expanding the clinical phenotype ofCold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2022Article
- Ultrasound of congenital spine anomalies.Pediatric radiology · 2021Review
- Risk of occult spinal dysraphism based on lumbosacral cutaneous manifestations.SAGE open medicine · 2021Article
- A Hospital Based Cross Sectional Study of Midline Cutaneous Lesions in Neonates and its Association with Spinal Dysraphism Detected Using Ultrasound.Indian dermatology online journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Occult spinal dysraphism (OSD) is the most common congenital spinal anomaly. Cutaneous anomalies such as skin dimples or deviated gluteal folds are well known as stigmata of OSD and are indicators for further evaluation; however, the association between cutaneous anomalies and OSD has not been systemically evaluated. Objective: To evaluate the incidence of OSD and the proportion of OSD cases managed with a neurosurgical intervention among neonates or infants with various cutaneous stigmata. Data Sources: PubMed and Embase databases were searched for studies published up to July 25, 2018, that evaluated the proportion of OSD cases in neonates or infants with cutaneous stigmata. Search terms included ultrasound, dysraphism, dimple, and infant or neonate. The search was limited to English-language publications. Study Selection: Two reviewers selected the studies evaluating the incidence of OSD among neonates or infants with cutaneous stigmata. Data Extraction and Synthesis: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for data extraction were followed. Pooled proportions of OSD cases and OSD cases that were managed with a neurosurgical intervention were obtained using the generalized linear mixed model and maximum likelihood method. Main Outcome and Measures: The pooled incidence of OSD and OSD cases managed with neurological surgery among patients with cutaneous stigmata was the primary outcome. This outcome was also evaluated in each subgroup, and heterogeneity was explored using subgroup analysis. Results: A total of 15 studies, involving 6558 neonate or infant patients with various cutaneous stigmata, were included. The pooled proportion of OSD cases among the patients with cutaneous stigmata was 2.8% (95% CI, 2.1%-3.8%; I2 = 51.6%), and the proportion managed with neurological surgery was 0.6% (95% CI, 0.3%-1.3%; I2 = 66.4%). Cases with combined stigmata showed a significantly higher association with OSD than those with a single stigma (10.5% [95% CI, 6.9%-15.8%] vs 2.3% [%, 95% CI, 1.5%-3.5%]; P < .001). The pooled proportion of OSD cases among patients with an atypical dimple was significantly higher than among those with simple dimple (8.8% [95% CI, 4.5%-16.6%] vs 0.6% [95% CI of 1.4%-2.1%]; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: The proportion of OSD in healthy, asymptomatic patients with midline cutaneous stigmata was low, and the proportion of patients who underwent a neurosurgical intervention was even lower. However, a careful evaluation as well as potential spinal magnetic resonance imaging is recommended for neonates or infants with combined stigmata or an atypical dimple for possible high-risk lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.