ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2020
Evaluation of Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Associations With Treatment and Survival in Uveal Melanoma, 2004-2014.
Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Novel Nomogram and Risk Classification System Predicting the Cancer-Specific Mortality of Patients with Initially Diagnosed Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2021Trial
- Disparities in Patients with Choroidal Melanoma between Black and Hispanic versus Non-Hispanic White Patients.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2026Article
- Associations of Social and Demographic Factors on the Outcomes of Ocular Melanoma and Other Adult Ocular Neoplasms in the United States: A Systematic Review.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2026Review
- Competing risk analysis of prognosis in patients with uveal melanoma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Socioeconomic and ethnic disparities in breast cancer-related lymphedema and quality-of-life after immediate lymphatic reconstruction.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Individual and community-level social determinant impact on HPV-differentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma disparities in the USA.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Precision prognostic model for uveal melanoma: nomogram prediction and comparison with AJCC system.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- A nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival of ocular melanoma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Patterns of recurrence among adults diagnosed with screen-detected lung cancer.Cancer epidemiology · 2025Article
- Uveal Melanoma: 5-Year Update on Incidence, Treatment, and Survival (SEER 1975-2020).Ocular oncology and pathology · 2025Article
- Effect of Social Determinants of Health and Geography on Uveal Melanoma.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Area Socioeconomic Status is Associated with Refusal of Recommended Surgery in Patients with Metastatic Bone and Joint Disease.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Assessment of Social Vulnerabilities of Care and Prognosis in Adult Ocular Melanomas in the US.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Uveal melanoma in the Iranian population: two decades of patient management in a tertiary eye center.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2024Article
- Association of Fitzpatrick Skin Type with metastatic risk from uveal melanoma in 854 consecutive patients at a single center.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Inclusive research in ophthalmology is mission critical! The 10-point action plan.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- A prognostic nomogram for the cancer-specific survival rate of choroidal melanoma using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Sex Differences in the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma in a Group of 1336 Patients.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Impact of Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Disease-Specific and Conditional Survival.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Identifying disparities in uveal melanoma (UM) treatment patterns and survival across racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic (SES) groups reveals possible inequities in ophthalmologic health care. Objective: To examine the association of race, ethnicity, and SES with UM treatment and survival. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort analysis of 28% of the US population using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registries from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2014, was conducted. Data analysis was performed from April to July 2018. SEER identified 4475 individuals using International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition site and morphology codes. Exposures: Race, ethnicity, and SES estimated by tertile using Yost Index composite scores. Main Outcomes and Measures: Treatment odds ratios (ORs), 1-year and 5-year survival estimates, mortality hazard ratios (HRs), and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Hypothesis was formulated before data collection. Results: Multivariate analyses of 4475 individuals (2315 [51.7%] men; non-Hispanic white, 4130 [92.3%]; nonwhite, 345 [7.7%]) showed that patients who were nonwhite (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.12-1.88) and socioeconomically disadvantaged (lower SES: OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.82-2.68; middle SES: OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.56-2.21) were more likely to receive primary enucleation. No interactions were observed between race/ethnicity, SES, and stage at diagnosis. From 2004 to 2014, rates of primary enucleation decreased across all racial/ethnic and SES groups, but disparities persisted. Socioeconomically disadvantaged patients had lower 5-year all-cause survival rates (lower SES: 69.2%; middle SES: 68.1%; and upper SES: 73.8%), although disease-specific survival did not vary significantly by racial/ethnic or SES strata. Mortality risk was associated with older age at diagnosis (56-68 years: HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.44-2.01; ≥69 years: HR, 3.32; 95% CI, 2.85-3.86), advanced stage of UM (stage 2: HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.19-1.65; stage 3: HR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.87-2.73; and stage 4: HR, 10.09; 95% CI, 7.39-13.77), and treatment with primary enucleation (HR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.88-2.44) with no racial/ethnic or SES variation. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, SEER data from 2004 to 2014 suggest that nonwhite and socioeconomically disadvantaged patients with UM are more likely to be treated with primary enucleation, although no such variation appears to exist in disease-specific survival. These differences reveal opportunities to address issues regarding treatment choice in UM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.