ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2020
The effect of prior thecal puncture on cerebrospinal fluid analytes in normal adult horses.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of prior thecal puncture on cerebrospinal fluid analytes in normal adult horses.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2020Article
- Comparison of atlantoaxial and lumbosacral cerebrospinal fluid centesis techniques in South American camelids.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSerial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis might be required in clinical neurologic disease. The effect of lumbosacral (LS) or cervical (C1-C2) centesis on subsequent CSF cytologic analyses has not been investigated in horses.
objectiveTo evaluate the effect of thecal puncture on subsequent CSF analyses ANIMALS: Ten healthy adult horses.
methodsProspective study. Horses were randomly assigned to undergo CSF collection twice, 14 days apart, from either the C1-C2 or LS space. After a 4-month washout period, CSF collection was repeated from the alternate site. Continuous data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models and count data using mixed-effects negative binomial regression. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.
resultsThere was no significant effect of collection day (day 0 or day 14) for any CSF analytes, including protein concentration (C1-C2: 45 [95% CI: 33-57] mg/dL day 0 vs 49 [95% CI: 39-62] mg/dL day 14, P = .12; LS: 64 [95% CI: 41-100] mg/dL day 0 vs 83 [95% CI: 53-129] mg/dL day 14, P = .37), or nucleated cell count (C1-C2: 2 [95% CI: 1-4] cells/μL day 0 vs 3 [95% CI: 1-4] cells/μL day 14, P = .65; LS: 3 [95% CI: 2-5] cells/μL day 0 vs 5 [95% CI: 3-8] cells/μL day 14, P = .10). There was no significant difference in EPM titer or EPM serum : CSF ratio between days 0 and 14. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Repeat thecal puncture from the LS or C1-C2 space 2 weeks apart does not appear to impact CSF analytes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.