Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32614103›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2020

Reliability of glycosylated hemoglobin in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Duria A Rayis, Abdel B A Ahmed, Manal E Sharif, Amir ElSouli, Ishag Adam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An age matched case-control study on the risk factors for the gestational diabetes mellitus among primiparous women.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. The calculated versus the measured glycosylated haemoglobin (HbAJournal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Improved gestational diabetes screening protocol.Advances in laboratory medicine · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Duria A RayisFaculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8576-3573
Abdel B A AhmedCollege of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Manal E SharifUnaizah College of Medicine, Qassim University, Unaizah, Saudi Arabia.
Amir ElSouliUnaizah College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Unaizah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Qassim, Uniazah, Saudi Arabia, 11111, Saudi Arabia.
Ishag AdamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unaizah College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Unaizah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) performed at 24-28 weeks gestation is the current recommended method to the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Many recent studies investigating HbA1c in detecting GDM yield different results. There are no published data on HbA1c in the diagnosis of GDM in Sub-Saharan countries including Sudan.

methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out at the antenatal care of Saad Abuelela Maternity Hospital, Khartoum, Sudan during the period from February to November 2018 to assess the reliability of HbA1c in the diagnosis of GDM. GDM was diagnosed according to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups using a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test.

resultsThree hundred and forty-eight women were enrolled. The mean (SD) of the age, gravidity, and gestational age of the enrolled women were 27.8 (5.6) years, 2.36 (2.2) and 26.26 (2.43) weeks, respectively. Sixty-eight women (19.5%) had GDM. A poor productively for HbA1c in diagnosis GDM was shown (AUC = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.55-0.69). At HbA1c level of 4.150%, the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis for GDM were 76.51% and 37.85%, respectively. At HbA1c level of 5.850%, the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis for GDM were 13.24% and 91.43%, respectively. While there was no significant (Spearman) correlation between fasting blood glucose and HbA1c, there were significant correlations between HbA1c and OGTT 1 and 2 hours of OGTT.

conclusionIn this study, HbA1c has a poor reliability, insufficient sensitivity or specificity for use to diagnose GDM.

Indexed as

AdultArea Under CurveDiabetes, GestationalFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestGlycated HemoglobinHumansPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityStatistics, NonparametricGlycated Hemoglobingestational diabetesglucose tolerance testhemoglobin A1cpregnancySudan

Identifiers

PMID32614103
PMCPMC7595906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.