Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32613939›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2020

Active surveillance of acute paediatric hospitalisations demonstrates the impact of vaccination programmes and informs vaccine policy in Canada and Australia.

Karina A Top, Kristine Macartney, Julie A Bettinger, Ben Tan, Christopher C Blyth, Helen S Marshall, Wendy Vaudry, Scott A Halperin, Peter McIntyre, IMPACT and PAEDS investigators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Karina A TopDepartment of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Kristine MacartneyThese authors contributed equally.
Julie A BettingerUniversity of British Columbia and Vaccine Evaluation Center, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.
Ben TanUniversity of Saskatchewan, Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Canada.
Christopher C BlythTelethon Kids Institute and School of Medicine, University of Western Australia and Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Helen S MarshallRobinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide and VIRTU Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, Australia.
Wendy VaudryUniversity of Alberta, Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Canada.
Scott A HalperinDepartment of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Peter McIntyreNational Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance and The Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
IMPACT and PAEDS investigatorsThe IMPACT and PAEDS investigators are acknowledged at the end of this article.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sentinel surveillance of acute hospitalisations in response to infectious disease emergencies such as the 2009 influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 pandemic is well described, but recognition of its potential to supplement routine public health surveillance and provide scalability for emergency responses has been limited. We summarise the achievements of two national paediatric hospital surveillance networks relevant to vaccine programmes and emerging infectious diseases in Canada (Canadian Immunization Monitoring Program Active; IMPACT from 1991) and Australia (Paediatric Active Enhanced Disease Surveillance; PAEDS from 2007) and discuss opportunities and challenges in applying their model to other contexts. Both networks were established to enhance capacity to measure vaccine preventable disease burden, vaccine programme impact, and safety, with their scope occasionally being increased with emerging infectious diseases' surveillance. Their active surveillance has increased data accuracy and utility for syndromic conditions (e.g. encephalitis), pathogen-specific diseases (e.g. pertussis, rotavirus, influenza), and adverse events following immunisation (e.g. febrile seizure), enabled correlation of biological specimens with clinical context and supported responses to emerging infections (e.g. pandemic influenza, parechovirus, COVID-19). The demonstrated long-term value of continuous, rather than incident-related, operation of these networks in strengthening routine surveillance, bridging research gaps, and providing scalable public health response, supports their applicability to other countries.

Indexed as

AustraliaCanadaChildChild, PreschoolData AccuracyHealth PolicyHospitalizationHospitals, PediatricHumansImmunization ProgramsNational Health ProgramsPatient AdmissionPopulation SurveillancePublic Health SurveillanceVaccinationVaccinesVaccinesCOVID-19emerging infectious diseasesimmunisationpaediatric hospital surveillancepandemic influenzaSARS-CoV-2surveillancesyndromic conditionsvaccinationvaccine-preventable disease

Identifiers

PMID32613939
PMCPMC7331140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.