Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32613566›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2020

Method development for on-line species-specific sulfur isotopic analysis by means of capillary electrophoresis/multicollector ICP-mass spectrometry.

Sebastian Faßbender, Katerina Rodiouchkina, Frank Vanhaecke, Björn Meermann

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sebastian Faßbender *Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Division 1.1 - Inorganic Trace Analysis, Richard-Willstätter-Str. 11, 12489, Berlin, Germany.
Katerina Rodiouchkina *Department of Chemistry, Atomic & Mass Spectrometry - A&MS research unit, Ghent University, Campus Sterre, Krijgslaan 281-S12, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Frank VanhaeckeDepartment of Chemistry, Atomic & Mass Spectrometry - A&MS research unit, Ghent University, Campus Sterre, Krijgslaan 281-S12, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Björn MeermannFederal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Division 1.1 - Inorganic Trace Analysis, Richard-Willstätter-Str. 11, 12489, Berlin, Germany. bjoern.meermann@bam.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8636-0765
Federal Institute For Materials Research and Testing · DEGhent University · BE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft reference no.: ME 3685/3-1, project no.: 321800101Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek ET-HoME - ID 30442502 & ZW15-02 - G0H6216N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, a method for species-specific isotopic analysis of sulfur via capillary electrophoresis hyphenated on-line with multicollector ICP-MS (CE/MC-ICP-MS) was developed. Correction for the mass bias caused by instrumental mass discrimination was realized via external correction with multiple-injection sample-standard bracketing. By comparing the isotope ratio measurement results obtained using the newly developed on-line CE/MC-ICP-MS method with those obtained via traditional MC-ICP-MS measurement after analyte/matrix separation by anion exchange chromatography for isotopic reference materials and an in-house bracketing standard, the most suitable data evaluation method could be identified. The repeatability for the sulfate-δ

Indexed as

Environmental speciationMultiple-injection sample-standard bracketing approachRiver water sulfateSpecies-specific isotopic analysis via on-line CE/MC-ICP-MSSulfur isotopes

Identifiers

PMID32613566
PMCPMC8236454
OpenAlexW3038429038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.