SynthesisLangenbeck's archives of surgery2020
Systematic review on immunonutrition in partial pancreatoduodenectomy.
Synthesis in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Current Trend and Outcomes on Immunonutrition in Medical and Surgical Fields: An Updated Perspective.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2024Review
- Review
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe effect of immunonutrition (IM) on postoperative outcomes has been investigated in gastrointestinal cancer surgery; however, strong evidence regarding IM in partial pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is lacking. This study evaluated the effect of IM on short-term outcomes in patients undergoing PD.
methodsA systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials was conducted to identify the studies investigating the IM effect on outcomes in PD. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR). Studies were evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
resultsFive studies were included in the meta-analysis. IM was associated with a lower incidence of overall complications (RR 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58, 0.94; P = 0.01; I
conclusionsIM administration in PD can prevent the incidence of overall and infectious complications postoperatively (GRADE recommendation: moderate). However, IM has no impact on major complications, mortality, and PD-specific complications (GRADE recommendation: low).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.