Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32613534›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2020

Evaluation of the Opinions of Family Physicians on Some Tobacco Products.

Hatice Nilden Arslan, Muhammet Ali Oruc, Ozlem Terzi, Nazmi Bilir

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hatice Nilden ArslanDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey. hnzaaa@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3237-7123
Muhammet Ali OrucProvincial Health Directorate, Samsun, Turkey.
Ozlem TerziDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey.
Nazmi Bilir, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the opinions of family physicians, who have an important place in preventive health services, on some tobacco products. The sample of the descriptive study was composed of family physicians working in 408 family health centers serving Samsun, Turkey. The data were obtained by distributing a questionnaire prepared by the researchers to volunteer family physicians during in-service trainings organized by the Samsun Provincial Directorate of Health in February and March 2019. In all, 322 (79%) family physicians who participated in the trainings were included in the study. The average age of the participating physicians was 45.0 ± 7.6 years; 61.5% of them were male. More than one third (36.0%) of family physicians said that they had never smoked, while 23.6% of them were current smokers. Most (85.0%) said that they knew what an electronic cigarette was, 94.7% of them were familiar with hookahs, and 9.0% knew about I Quit Ordinary Smoking (IQOS). It is important to inform all healthcare professionals, and especially family physicians, about those products marketed by the tobacco industry as "less harmful" than cigarettes. It is thought that providing appropriate counseling services to these professionals will contribute to the fight against tobacco use.

Indexed as

Physicians, FamilyAdultElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmokersSmokingSmoking Water PipesSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco ProductsTobacco UseTurkeyCigaretteElectronic cigaretteFamily physicianHookahIQOS

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.