Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32613409›Full record

SynthesisOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2020

Persistence and adherence to parenteral osteoporosis therapies: a systematic review.

G Koller, V Goetz, B Vandermeer, J Homik, F A McAlister, D Kendler, C Ye

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparing medication adherence in patients receiving bisphosphonates for preventing fragility fractures: a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Long-term adherence to anti-osteoporosis medication and determinants of adherence in the population-based screening trial ROSE.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Socioeconomic vulnerability and osteoporosis treatment disparities during COVID-19 lockdown among U.S. medicare enrollees who initiated romosozumab.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Early and multiple doses of zoledronate mitigates rebound bone loss following withdrawal of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand inhibition.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G KollerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Alberta, 8-130 Clinical Sciences Building, 11350 83rd Avenue NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G3, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6683-2043
V GoetzDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Alberta, 8-130 Clinical Sciences Building, 11350 83rd Avenue NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G3, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3137-1966
B VandermeerAlberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Biostatistician, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7449-5251
J HomikDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Alberta, 8-130 Clinical Sciences Building, 11350 83rd Avenue NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G3, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7943-8803
F A McAlisterDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7435-3341
D KendlerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7679-3965
C YeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Alberta, 8-130 Clinical Sciences Building, 11350 83rd Avenue NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G3, Canada. cye@ualberta.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9858-5398
University of Alberta · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a chronic disease of low bone mass and fragility. Treatment is frequently compromised by suboptimal medication compliance causing increased morbidity. This review investigates adherence and persistence to parenteral osteoporosis therapies. Findings reveal parenteral medications requiring reduced dosing frequency have higher compliance than oral therapies. This systematic review examines real-world adherence to parenteral osteoporosis therapies. We searched PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE databases for English language observational studies that examined patient adherence and/or persistence to parenteral osteoporosis treatments (teriparatide sc, ibandronate iv, zoledronic acid iv, and denosumab sc) in adults with osteoporosis published up to September 2018. Studies with only self-reported adherence or persistence data and those with less than 20 patients were excluded. Quality assessment of included studies was completed using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS). We identified 40 eligible studies. Teriparatide was examined in 29 studies, with persistence rates of 10-87% (median 55%) at 1 year and 10-69% (median 29.5%) at 2 years, and adherence rates of 21-89% (median 53%) at 1 year and 37-68% (median 40%) at 2 years. Ten studies of zoledronic acid reported persistence rates of 34-73% (median 42%) for second dose and 20-54% (median 35.8%) for third dose. Ten studies of ibandronate adherence reported and 2-year persistence rates of 31-58% (median 47.5%) in 1 year and 13-35% (median 25%) at 2 years, and adherence rates of 21-72% (median 47.3%) and 15-58% (median 36.5%) respectively. Denosumab was reported in 19 studies, with second (1 year) and fourth (2 year) dose persistence rates of 61-100% (median 81%) and 36-99% (median 45.5%). There is substantial heterogeneity in reports of persistence and adherence rates with parenteral osteoporosis therapies. Most of the published data are from short-term studies and evaluations of long-term adherence and persistence with parenteral therapies for osteoporosis are needed.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsMedication AdherenceOsteoporosisAdultDiphosphonatesFemaleHumansIbandronic AcidTeriparatideBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesIbandronic AcidTeriparatideAdherenceComplianceOsteoporosisParenteralPersistence

Identifiers

PMID32613409
OpenAlexW3038353092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.