ArticleClinical rheumatology2021
Risk factors for cervical spine instability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term outcomes of surgical treatment of cervical spine involvement in rheumatoid arthritis.International orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Subaxial Subluxation (SAS) and Cervical Deformity in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Relation to Selected Sagittal Balance Parameters.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based prediction of rheumatoid arthritis-associated deformity on MRI.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Atlantoaxial Instability in the Course of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Relation to Selected Parameters of Sagittal Balance.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Risk factors for cervical instability in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2024Review
- The assessment of atlantoaxial joint involvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, results from an observational "real-life" study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Relationship between Cervical Instability in the Course of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Pelvic Parameters of Sagittal Balance.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Pathoanatomy, biomechanics, and treatment of upper cervical ligamentous instability: A literature review.Orthopedic reviews · 2022Review
- [Analysis of cervical instability and clinical characteristics in treatment-naive rheumatoid arthritis patients].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2021Article
- Radiological Evaluation of Cervical Spine Involvement in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Twelve Weeks of Strengthening Exercise for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Prospective Intervention Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCervical spine (C-spine) instability is a unique and significant characteristic of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) because its occurrence is not rare and it can cause compressive cervical myelopathy, which may lead to serious neurologic sequelae. This study evaluated the prevalence and risk factors of C-spine instabilities in RA patients with a focus on anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapies.
methodsThe presence of C-spine instabilities in 1114 patients with RA was evaluated using C-spine radiographies according to the defined metrics. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of C-spine instability. The initiation of biologic DMARDs was assessed via a Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using log-rank tests.
resultsIn total, 306 (27.5%) patients presented with C-spine instabilities. The most common type was atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS; n = 199 [17.9%]). Male sex, positivity for rheumatoid factor and ACPA, erosive change in the peripheral joints, and presence of osteoporosis were independently associated with C-spine instabilities (all P < 0.05). In particular, positivity for ACPA was the most powerful risk factor (odds ratio: 2.33 [95% confidence interval: 1.37, 3.96], P = 0.002), and it was closely associated with AAS. Patients with AAS were at a higher risk for early initiation of biologic DMARDs.
conclusionsPositivity for ACPA was a significant risk factor for C-spine instability, and AAS was remarkably correlated to the early initiation of biologic DMARDs, a surrogate index of poor long-term outcomes. Key Points • The presence of antibodies against citrullinated proteins was a strong risk factor for C-spine instability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. • Atlantoaxial subluxation was significantly associated with early initiation of biologic DMARDs, a surrogate index of poor long-term outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.