Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32613363›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Is it Wise to Omit Sentinel Node Biopsy in Elderly Patients with Breast Cancer?

James Sun, Brittany J Mathias, Weihong Sun, William J Fulp, Jun-Min Zhou, Christine Laronga, Loretta S Loftus, M Catherine Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Omission of Axillary Staging and Survival in Elderly Women With Early Stage Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James SunDepartment of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Brittany J MathiasDepartment of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Weihong SunDepartment of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
William J FulpDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Jun-Min ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Christine LarongaDepartment of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Loretta S LoftusDepartment of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
M Catherine LeeDepartment of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA. Marie.Lee@moffitt.org.
Moffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Society of Surgical Oncology's Choosing Wisely MATERIALS AND

methodsA single-institution retrospective review of consecutive cN0 women ≥ 70 years of age who received SLNB was performed. We collected clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment data. Patients were compared according to SLN status with subset analysis of HR-positive patients. Outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and univariable analysis, and were compared using log-rank tests.

resultsOf 500 patients, 345 (69%) were SLN-negative. Median age was 74 years (range 70-96). Most tumors were T1 (72%), N0 (69%), invasive ductal (77%), without lymphovascular invasion (88%), estrogen receptor-positive (88%) and progesterone receptor-positive (75%), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (88%) treated with lumpectomy (71%). Median number of SLNs obtained was 2 (range 0-12) and median number of positive SLNs was 0 (range 0-8). Characteristics of the HR-positive subset were similar. In both the overall cohort and the HR-positive subset, SLN status significantly affected the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, although no significant effect on recurrence was observed. SLN-negative patients had better overall survival and less distant recurrence (both p < 0.0001). Adjuvant hormone therapy significantly improved overall survival.

conclusionsSLNB can be safely omitted in elderly patients with T1, HR-positive, invasive ductal carcinoma tumors, but may still provide important information affecting treatment. Patients who are candidates for adjuvant systemic chemotherapy should still be considered for SLNB.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAgedAged, 80 and overAxillaFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32613363
OpenAlexW3039436863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.