ArticleMycorrhiza2020
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus identity modulates growth effects of endophyte-infected grasses on neighboring plants.
Article in Mycorrhiza, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and earthworms on plant-soil systems of urban turf grasses.PeerJ · 2025Article
- Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Selectively Promoted the Growth of Three Ecological Restoration Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Plant Species Complementarity in Low-Fertility Degraded Soil.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Endophytes of grasses have been reported to affect the colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) not only of their dual host plant but also of neighboring non-endophyte-infected plants. However, studies investigating the impact of AMF identity on the effects of endophyte-infected grasses on neighboring plants are rare. In this study, we investigated the influence of Leymus chinensis litter type (NL, no litter; E-, endophyte-free litter; E-E+, half E+ and half E- litter; E+, endophyte-infected litter) on Stipa krylovii growth with different AMF species (Claroideoglomus etunicatum, CE; Funneliformis mosseae, FM; Claroideoglomus claroideum, CC; Rhizophagus intraradices, RI). The results showed that the root biomass of S. krylovii tended to decrease with the increase of E+ litter in the mycorrhiza-free treatment. With AMF inoculation, the effects of E+ litter on the AMF colonization rate and root biomass of S. krylovii varied with AMF species. Structural equation modeling (SEM) showed E+ litter could modulate the growth of S. krylovii indirectly via changes in AMF colonization rate, but this effect was related to AMF species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.