ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2020
[Minimally invasive stabilization of thoracolumbar osteoporotic fractures].
Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of routine transpedicular biopsies during kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures in the detection of malignant diseases: a systematic review.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A clinical efficacy evaluation.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024Article
- Evaluation of biopsy results during vertebral augmentation in patients with a known history of malignancy.European radiology · 2023Article
- Avoiding Spinal Implant Failures in Osteoporotic Patients: A Narrative Review.Global spine journal · 2023Article
- Possible Correlation Between Kyphosis of Lumbar Osteoporosis Fractures and the Spinal Signal Intensity Ratio (SSIR).International journal of spine surgery · 2021Article
- [Minimally invasive posterior and anterior stabilization of the thoracolumbar spine after traumatic injuries].Der Unfallchirurg · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMinimally invasive stabilization of thoracolumbar osteoporotic fractures (OF) in neurologically intact patients is well established. Various posterior and anterior surgical techniques are available. The OF classification and OF score are helpful for defining the indications and choice of operative technique.
objectiveThis article gives an overview of the minimally invasive stabilization techniques, typical complications and outcome. MATERIAL AND
methodsSelective literature search and description of surgical techniques and outcome.
resultsVertebral body augmentation alone can be indicated in painful but stable fractures of types OF 1 and OF 2 and to some extent for type OF 3. Kyphoplasty has proven to be an effective and safe procedure with a favorable clinical outcome. Unstable fractures and kyphotic deformities (types OF 3-5) should be percutaneously stabilized from posterior. The length of the pedicle screw construct depends on the extent of instability and deformity. Bone cement augmentation of the pedicle screws is indicated in severe osteoporosis but increases the complication rate. Restoration of stability of the anterior column can be achieved through additional vertebral body augmentation or rarely by anterior stabilization. Clinical and radiological short and mid-term results of the stabilization techniques are promising; however, the more invasive the surgery, the more complications occur.
conclusionMinimally invasive stabilization techniques are safe and effective. The specific indications for the individual procedures are guided by the OF classification and the individual clinical situation of the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.