Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32613224›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2022

Effects of HF-rTMS over the left and right DLPFC on proactive and reactive cognitive control.

Matias M Pulopulos, Jens Allaert, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt, Alvaro Sanchez-Lopez, Sara De Witte, Chris Baeken, Rudi De Raedt

Open access · goldAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) on global cognitive function of elderly in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Interbrain Synchrony Mitigates Extremism Within Echo Chambers.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matias M PulopulosDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7048-3795
Jens AllaertDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2745-1923
Marie-Anne VanderhasseltDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Alvaro Sanchez-LopezDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Sara De WitteDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Chris BaekenDepartment of Head and Skin, University Hospital Ghent (UZ Ghent), Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Rudi De RaedtDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BEUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research supports the distinction between proactive and reactive control. Although the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has been consistently related to these processes, lateralization of proactive and reactive control is still under debate. We manipulated brain activity to investigate the role of the left and right DLPFC in proactive and reactive cognitive control. Using a single-blind, sham-controlled crossover within-subjects design, 25 young healthy females performed the 'AX' Continuous Performance Task after receiving sham vs active high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) to increase left and right DLPFC activity. Reaction times (RTs) and pupillometry were used to assess patterns of proactive and reactive cognitive control and task-related resource allocation, respectively. We observed that, compared to sham, HF-rTMS over the left DLPFC increased proactive control. After right DLPFC HF-rTMS, participants showed slower RTs on AX trials, suggesting more reactive control. However, this latter result was not supported by RTs on BX trials (i.e. the trial that specifically assess reactive control). Pupil measures showed a sustained increase in resource allocation after both active left and right HF-rTMS. Our results with RT data provide evidence on the role of the left DLPFC in proactive control and suggest that the right DLPFC is implicated in reactive control.

Indexed as

Prefrontal CortexTranscranial Magnetic StimulationCognitionFemaleHumansReaction TimeSingle-Blind MethodAX-CPTHF-rTMSneurostimulationproactive cognitive controlreactive control

Identifiers

PMID32613224
PMCPMC8824550
OpenAlexW3046186381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.