Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32613192›Full record

ArticleWorld neurosurgery: X2020

Conservative Treatment and Percutaneous Pain Relief Techniques in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations.

Maurizio Fornari, Scott C Robertson, Paulo Pereira, Mehmet Zileli, Carla D Anania, Ana Ferreira, Silvano Ferrari, Roberto Gatti, Francesco Costa

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World neurosurgery: X, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06956664 (Comparative Efficacy of Physiotherapeutic Exercise Regimens Implemented After Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06956664 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Efficacy of Physiotherapeutic Exercise Regimens Implemented After Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection

TypeinterventionalSponsorÇankırı Karatekin UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled42ConditionsIntervertebral Disc Displacement, Low Back Pain, RadiculopathyArmsConventional Physiotherapy, Aerobic Exercise Programme, Core-Stabilization Exercise Programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of calcitonin on lumbar spinal stenosis.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and characteristics of physiotherapy interventions in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment approaches to chronic lumbar back pain.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Maurizio FornariNeurosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Scott C RobertsonNeurosurgery Department, Laredo Medical Center, University of the Incarnate Word School of Osteopathic Medicine, Laredo, Texas, USA.
Paulo PereiraDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Center of São João and Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Mehmet ZileliDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey.
Carla D AnaniaNeurosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Ana FerreiraDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Center of São João and Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Silvano FerrariHumanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Roberto GattiHumanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Francesco CostaNeurosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITHumanitas University · ITUniversidade do Porto · PTEge University · TRUniversity of the Incarnate Word · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDegenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a progressive disease with potentially dangerous consequences that affect quality of life. Despite the detailed literature, natural history is unpredictable. This uncertainty presents a challenge making the correct management decisions, especially in patients with mild to moderate symptoms, regarding conservative or surgical treatment. This article focused on conservative treatment for degenerative LSS.

methodsTo standardize clinical practice worldwide as much as possible, the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Spine Committee held a consensus conference on conservative treatment for degenerative LSS. A team of experts in spinal disorders reviewed the literature on conservative treatment for degenerative LSS from 2008 to 2018 and drafted and voted on a number of statements.

resultsDuring 2 consensus meetings, 14 statements were voted on. The Committee agreed on the use of physical therapy for up to 3 months in cases with no neurologic symptoms. Initial conservative treatment could be applied without major complications in these cases. In patients with moderate to severe symptoms or with acute radicular deficits, surgical treatment is indicated. The efficacy of epidural injections is still debated, as it shows only limited benefit in patients with degenerative LSS.

conclusionsA conservative approach based on therapeutic exercise may be the first choice in patients with LSS except in the presence of significant neurologic deficits. Treatment with instrumental modalities or epidural injections is still debated. Further studies with standardization of outcome measures are needed to reach high-level evidence conclusions.

Indexed as

Conservative treatmentFollow-up of LSSGuidelinesLBP, Low back painLS, Likert scaleLSSLSS, Lumbar spinal stenosisLumbar spinal stenosisPercutaneous pain relief techniquesPT, Physical therapyRCT, Randomized controlled trialWFNS, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies

Identifiers

PMID32613192
PMCPMC7322792
OpenAlexW3035779970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.