ArticleHeliyon2020
Comparing performance of ensemble methods in predicting movie box office revenue.
Article in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stacked Ensemble Learning for Classification of Parkinson's Disease Using Telemonitoring Vocal Features.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Towards Data-Driven Decision-Making in the Korean Film Industry: An XAI Model for Box Office Analysis Using Dimension Reduction, Clustering, and Classification.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Analyzing drama metadata through machine learning to gain insights into social information dissemination patterns.PloS one · 2023Article
- Optimizing Film Companies' Marketing Strategy Using Blockchain and Recurrent Neural Network Model.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While many business intelligence methods have been applied to predict movie box office revenue, the studies using an ensemble approach to predict box office revenue are almost nonexistent. In this study, we propose decision trees, k-nearest-neighbors (k-NN), and linear regression using ensemble methods and the prediction performance of decision trees based on random forests, bagging and boosting are compared with that of k-NN and linear regression based on bagging and boosting using the sample of 1439 movies. The results indicate that ensemble methods based on decision trees (random forests, bagging, boosting) outperform ensemble methods based on k-NN (bagging, boosting) in predicting box office at week 1, 2, 3 after release. Decision trees using ensemble methods provide better prediction performance than ensemble methods based on linear regression analysis in the box office at week 1 after release. This is explained by the results that after comparing the prediction performance between ensemble methods and non-ensemble methods. For decision tree methods, unlike the other methods, the prediction performance of ensemble methods is greater than that of non-ensemble methods. This shows that decision trees using ensemble methods provide better application effectiveness of ensemble methods than k-NN and linear regression analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.