Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32613125›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2020

Comparing performance of ensemble methods in predicting movie box office revenue.

Sangjae Lee, Bikash Kc, Joon Yeon Choeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sangjae LeeCollege of Business Administration, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, South Korea.
Bikash KcCollege of Business Administration, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, South Korea.
Joon Yeon ChoehDepartment of Software, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While many business intelligence methods have been applied to predict movie box office revenue, the studies using an ensemble approach to predict box office revenue are almost nonexistent. In this study, we propose decision trees, k-nearest-neighbors (k-NN), and linear regression using ensemble methods and the prediction performance of decision trees based on random forests, bagging and boosting are compared with that of k-NN and linear regression based on bagging and boosting using the sample of 1439 movies. The results indicate that ensemble methods based on decision trees (random forests, bagging, boosting) outperform ensemble methods based on k-NN (bagging, boosting) in predicting box office at week 1, 2, 3 after release. Decision trees using ensemble methods provide better prediction performance than ensemble methods based on linear regression analysis in the box office at week 1 after release. This is explained by the results that after comparing the prediction performance between ensemble methods and non-ensemble methods. For decision tree methods, unlike the other methods, the prediction performance of ensemble methods is greater than that of non-ensemble methods. This shows that decision trees using ensemble methods provide better application effectiveness of ensemble methods than k-NN and linear regression analysis.

Indexed as

Big dataBusiness managementData analysisData analyticsDecision treesEnsemble methodsManagementMovie box office revenuePrediction of box office revenue

Identifiers

PMID32613125
PMCPMC7322254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.