Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32613069›Full record

ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2020

Key considerations for comprehensive validation of an RNA fusion NGS panel.

Subit Barua, Gary Wang, Mahesh Mansukhani, Susan Hsiao, Helen Fernandes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Harmonization trial ofPathologica · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. JTO clinical and research reports · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Subit BaruaDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA.
Gary WangDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA.
Mahesh MansukhaniDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA.
Susan HsiaoDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA.
Helen FernandesDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesValidation of RNA-based NGS assays for the detection of therapeutically targetable gene fusions is challenging. Here, we report systematic validation and quality control monitoring of our targeted fusion panel for the detection of 17 clinically relevant fusion transcripts across several tumor types. We implemented this RNA Fusion Panel as a reflex test for tumors lacking DNA driver mutations.

designForty-four formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) or fresh-frozen lung, brain, soft tissue and skin tumors were used to determine the accuracy of the assay. Additional fusion-positive specimens and a calibrated reference standard were used to establish the precision, reproducibility and sensitivity of the assay. All aspects of the validation, including quality control metrics, were performed according to New York State guidelines.

resultsFor the RNA fusion panel, accuracy, reproducibility and precision studies were above 99%. Reproducibility and sensitivity studies with the reference standard were helpful in identifying inconsistencies. The limit of detection for most RNA fusion transcripts was 50 copies. Application of the RNA fusion assay as a reflex test to 450 tumor samples lacking DNA driver mutations resulted in a 10% increase in diagnostic yield with minimal additional processing time.

conclusionsThe validated RNA fusion panel provides clinical utility in therapy selection for patients with solid tumors. By using a sequential testing approach, the RNA fusion assay complements the DNA hotspot assay in identifying clinically relevant variants across many tumor types with minimal additional increase in processing time.

Indexed as

AssayMolecular oncologyNext generation sequencingPrecision medicineRNA FusionsValidation

Identifiers

PMID32613069
PMCPMC7322345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.