ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2020
Key considerations for comprehensive validation of an RNA fusion NGS panel.
Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Small Nucleotide Variant Analysis Using RNA Fusion Panel (SMURF): Making the Most of RNAseq Data in Solid Tumours.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2026Article
- A novel one-step multiplex PCR method (OS-MPCR) for efficient NGS library preparation in cancer.PloS one · 2026Article
- Harmonization trial ofPathologica · 2025Article
- FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement analysis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using DNA/RNA-based NGS and FISH.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025Article
- Clinical Implementation of Expanded Solid Tumor Fusion Detection With Whole-Transcriptome Sequencing at an Academic Cancer Center.JCO precision oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Detection of Hybrid Fusion Transcripts, Aberrant Transcript Expression, and Specific Single Nucleotide Variants in Acute Leukemia and Myeloid Disorders with Recurrent Gene Rearrangements.Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology · 2024Article
- Consensus Recommendations to Optimize the Detection and Reporting ofCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing - Part 1: Tissue collection and management.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2022Review
- Comprehensive analysis of oncogenic fusions in mismatch repair deficient colorectal carcinomas by sequential DNA and RNA next generation sequencing.Journal of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesValidation of RNA-based NGS assays for the detection of therapeutically targetable gene fusions is challenging. Here, we report systematic validation and quality control monitoring of our targeted fusion panel for the detection of 17 clinically relevant fusion transcripts across several tumor types. We implemented this RNA Fusion Panel as a reflex test for tumors lacking DNA driver mutations.
designForty-four formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) or fresh-frozen lung, brain, soft tissue and skin tumors were used to determine the accuracy of the assay. Additional fusion-positive specimens and a calibrated reference standard were used to establish the precision, reproducibility and sensitivity of the assay. All aspects of the validation, including quality control metrics, were performed according to New York State guidelines.
resultsFor the RNA fusion panel, accuracy, reproducibility and precision studies were above 99%. Reproducibility and sensitivity studies with the reference standard were helpful in identifying inconsistencies. The limit of detection for most RNA fusion transcripts was 50 copies. Application of the RNA fusion assay as a reflex test to 450 tumor samples lacking DNA driver mutations resulted in a 10% increase in diagnostic yield with minimal additional processing time.
conclusionsThe validated RNA fusion panel provides clinical utility in therapy selection for patients with solid tumors. By using a sequential testing approach, the RNA fusion assay complements the DNA hotspot assay in identifying clinically relevant variants across many tumor types with minimal additional increase in processing time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.