ArticleFrontiers in public health2020
Living With COVID-19: A Systemic and Multi-Criteria Approach to Enact Evidence-Based Health Policy.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of economic evaluation in modelling public health and social measures for pandemic policy: a systematic review.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2024Article
- COVID-19 compliance among urban trail users: Behavioral insights and environmental implications.Journal of outdoor recreation and tourism · 2023Article
- Time to Lift up COVID-19 Restrictions? Public Support towards Living with the Virus Policy and Associated Factors among Hong Kong General Public.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- The collaborative outcomes study on health and functioning during infection times in adults (COH-FIT-Adults): Design and methods of an international online survey targeting physical and mental health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of affective disorders · 2022Article
- Knowledge and experience of physicians during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A global cross-sectional study.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Simulation-based multi-criteria decision making: an interactive method with a case study on infectious disease epidemics.Annals of operations research · 2021Article
- Pooled testing for SARS-CoV-2, options for efficiency at scale.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2021Article
- Superiority of Mild Interventions against COVID-19 on Public Health and Economic Measures.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Human Factors and Ergonomics and the management of existential threats: A work domain analysis of a COVID-19 return from lockdown restrictions system.Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing · 2021Article
- Infection vulnerability stratification risk modelling of COVID-19 data: a deterministic SEIR epidemic model analysis.Annals of operations research · 2021Article
- Feeling Uncertainty during the Lockdown That Commenced in March 2020 in Greece.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Factors Influencing Asia-Pacific Countries' Success Level in Curbing COVID-19: A Review Using a Social-Ecological System (SES) Framework.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Revealing spatiotemporal transmission patterns and stages of COVID-19 in China using individual patients' trajectory data.Computational urban science · 2021Article
- Follow *the* science? On the marginal role of the social sciences in the COVID-19 pandemic.European journal for philosophy of science · 2021Article
- Epidemic Spread and Its Management Through Governance and Leadership Response Influencing the Arising Challenges Around COVID-19 in Pakistan-A Lesson Learnt for Low Income Countries With Limited Resource.Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
- Individual Behaviors and COVID-19 Lockdown Exit Strategy: A Mid-Term Multidimensional Bio-economic Modeling Approach.Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
- Dying Alone Due to COVID-19: Do the Needs of the Many Outweigh the Rights of the Few-or the One?Frontiers in public healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The lifting of COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) lockdown requires, in the short and medium terms, a holistic and evidence-based approach to population health management based on combining risk factors and bio-economic outcomes, including actors' behaviors. This dynamic and global approach to health control is necessary to deal with the new paradigm of living with an infectious disease, which disrupts our individual freedom and behaviors. The challenge for policymakers consists of defining methods of lockdown-lifting and follow-up (middle-term rules) that best meet the needs for resumption of economic activity, societal wellbeing, and containment of the outbreak. There is no simple and ready-to-use way to do this since it means considering several competing objectives at the same time and continuously adapting the strategy and rules, ideally at local scale. We propose a framework for creating a precision evidence-based health policy that simultaneously considers public health, economic, and societal dimensions while accounting for constraints and uncertainty. It is based on the four following principles: integrating multiple and heterogeneous information, accepting navigation with uncertainty, adjusting the strategy dynamically with feedback mechanisms, and managing clusters through a multi-scalar conception. The evidence-based policy intervention for COVID-19 obtained includes scientific background via epidemiological modeling and bio-economic modeling. A set of quantitative and qualitative indicators are used as feedback to precisely monitor the societal-economic-epidemiological dynamics, allowing tightening or loosening of measures before epidemic damage (re-)occurs. Altogether, this allows an evidence-based policy that steers the strategy with precision and avoids any political shock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.