Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32612866›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2020

Current status and future directions of high-throughput ADME screening in drug discovery.

Wilson Z Shou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Building a Bridge Between Ambient MS and LC-MS by Non-Exhaustive Microdesorption.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The In Vitro Pharmacokinetics of Medicinal Plants: A Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Exploring the Antibacterial Potential ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Wilson Z ShouBristol-Myers Squibb, PO Box 4000, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the last decade high-throughput in vitro absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (HT-ADME) screening has become an essential part of any drug discovery effort of synthetic molecules. The conduct of HT-ADME screening has been "industrialized" due to the extensive development of software and automation tools in cell culture, assay incubation, sample analysis and data analysis. The HT-ADME assay portfolio continues to expand in emerging areas such as drug-transporter interactions, early soft spot identification, and ADME screening of peptide drug candidates. Additionally, thanks to the very large and high-quality HT-ADME data sets available in many biopharma companies, in silico prediction of ADME properties using machine learning has also gained much momentum in recent years. In this review, we discuss the current state-of-the-art practices in HT-ADME screening including assay portfolio, assay automation, sample analysis, data processing, and prediction model building. In addition, we also offer perspectives in future development of this exciting field.

Indexed as

Acoustic ejection mass spectrometryAutomationBioanalysisHT-ADMEIn vitroMass spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID32612866
PMCPMC7322755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.